2012 New Mexico Bowl has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones Date Process Result January 3, 2013 Good article nominee Listed

This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

College football Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject College football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of college football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.College footballWikipedia:WikiProject College footballTemplate:WikiProject College footballcollege football articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. United States: New Mexico Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject New Mexico.

This review is transcluded from Talk:2012 New Mexico Bowl/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Buggie111 ( talk · contribs) 18:30, 1 January 2013 (UTC) Nice to see either the Sun Devils or Wildcats do something good every once in a while... reply

• Firstly, I see that Refs 12 and 13 are the same (cite the same website). You fix this by using <ref name=rivals>Reference goes here...</ref> for the first instance and <ref name=rivals/> afterwards.
  • Well, #12 is the offensive statistics subpage and #13 is the defense...
    • It's all that "apple cider". Any way to modify the title so that it shows the difference? Buggie111 ( talk) 19:19, 1 January 2013 (UTC) reply
      • Done. Go Phightins ! 20:32, 1 January 2013 (UTC) reply
• comma after first instance of "wildcats"
  •  Done
• there only seems to be one ref in the lead. I think the MO here is ref all of it or none, but not 33% of it.
  • I agree, however this ref was included because it's the only instance within the article where it's mentioned that this is the first bowl...I thought it was worthy of being cited, but there was nowhere else to do so.
    • Possibly the "Pre-game statistics" section? Buggie111 ( talk) 19:19, 1 January 2013 (UTC) reply
      • Done. Go Phightins ! 20:32, 1 January 2013 (UTC) reply
• Second lead para might need some numbers for total offense, not just rushing yards.
  •  Added total offense
• "In the fourth quarter, Arizona was able to cut the lead to 45-35 on a 63-yard touchdown pass from Scott to Austin Hill. " could be "Arizona was able to cut the lead to 45-35 on a 63-yard touchdown pass from Scott to Austin Hill soon after the 4th quarter started. "
  • Cough, cough. Buggie111 ( talk) 22:05, 1 January 2013 (UTC) reply
    • Don't mock me! I have a cold right now! Not Funny! . I fixed that one; I just forgot to post something here. Go Phightins ! 01:28, 2 January 2013 (UTC) reply
• Don't know about whether or not to keep the stats table. 2011 Orange Bowl seems to list the stats in a more comfortable format.
  • Are you talking player stats? I thought a sortable table might make it easier to read than prose...thoughts? Go Phightins ! 18:52, 1 January 2013 (UTC) reply
    • Me too, but I'm wondering about the remainder of the community and what they'd think. I'm fine either way. Buggie111 ( talk) 19:18, 1 January 2013 (UTC) reply

All for now. Two weeks, good luck. Buggie111 ( talk) 18:30, 1 January 2013 (UTC) reply

Pass. Buggie111 ( talk) 00:39, 3 January 2013 (UTC) reply