![]() | 2012 CECAFA Cup was one of the Sports and recreation good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | ||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
Current status: Delisted good article |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||
|
Hey fellow editors,
I just wanted to start a discussion on the format of the article to reach a consensus and prevent future edit-warring. I think the article should be like this; the tournament's stages in their own sections with tables showing the standings and the scores for the group stage and a bracket and tables showing the scores for the knockout stage (except the third-place playoff and final), like the 2012 Kagame Interclub Cup article. I think it should be like this because it gives the reader an easier time reading and understanding the article. It also enables him to view the details of the various stages in their sub-pages, or if he doesn't want to view them he can just read the summaries on the main page. This saves time, energy and possibly even money (to pay for the modem, etc.) for the reader. What do the rest of you think? Davykamanzi → talk · contribs 14:47, 24 November 2012 (UTC)
Goals scored & conceded 62 in 26 games is 2.38, not 1.19. Every goal is a goal for and a goal against, not one or the other, or half and half. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 199.195.149.11 ( talk) 03:11, 9 December 2012 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Good888 ( talk · contribs) 09:20, 31 December 2014 (UTC)
I found the following issues.
The dead references are the biggest concern for me, especially ref 1 which is used three times. Going to place on hold for now. good888 ( talk) 19:01, 31 December 2014 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA from 2015. Has the same issues as the 2000 CECAFA Cup and the 2013 CECAFA Cup which were delisted. That being unsourced statements and the article not being broad enough. Onegreatjoke ( talk) 21:37, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
![]() | 2012 CECAFA Cup was one of the Sports and recreation good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | ||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
Current status: Delisted good article |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||
|
Hey fellow editors,
I just wanted to start a discussion on the format of the article to reach a consensus and prevent future edit-warring. I think the article should be like this; the tournament's stages in their own sections with tables showing the standings and the scores for the group stage and a bracket and tables showing the scores for the knockout stage (except the third-place playoff and final), like the 2012 Kagame Interclub Cup article. I think it should be like this because it gives the reader an easier time reading and understanding the article. It also enables him to view the details of the various stages in their sub-pages, or if he doesn't want to view them he can just read the summaries on the main page. This saves time, energy and possibly even money (to pay for the modem, etc.) for the reader. What do the rest of you think? Davykamanzi → talk · contribs 14:47, 24 November 2012 (UTC)
Goals scored & conceded 62 in 26 games is 2.38, not 1.19. Every goal is a goal for and a goal against, not one or the other, or half and half. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 199.195.149.11 ( talk) 03:11, 9 December 2012 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Good888 ( talk · contribs) 09:20, 31 December 2014 (UTC)
I found the following issues.
The dead references are the biggest concern for me, especially ref 1 which is used three times. Going to place on hold for now. good888 ( talk) 19:01, 31 December 2014 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA from 2015. Has the same issues as the 2000 CECAFA Cup and the 2013 CECAFA Cup which were delisted. That being unsourced statements and the article not being broad enough. Onegreatjoke ( talk) 21:37, 29 June 2023 (UTC)