![]() | A news item involving 2011 Tunisian Constituent Assembly election was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the In the news section on 28 October 2011. | ![]() |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I think, for the sake of consistency, we should decide whether to change this article to Tunisian Constituent Assembly election, 2011 or change the article Tunisian Constituent Assembly election, 1956 to Tunisian Constitutional Assembly election, 1956. If no one disagrees, I will change this article's title in a week.
Do we know what voting system will be used for this election? The article should say what it is. -- Cabalamat ( talk) 17:35, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
As far as I can see, at the moment there are no results yet, at least none are mentioned in the text. However, the infobox orders several of the parties under headers "first party", "second party" and so on! I don't understand this nonsense!-- 93.104.105.168 ( talk) 20:47, 23 October 2011 (UTC)
In Kebili both Nahda and CPR won 2 seats each. I do not think that the map should show Nahda as the only winner in Kebili - Nahda and CPR are head to head. Kind regards -- RJFF ( talk) 18:50, 27 October 2011 (UTC)
Could this diagram I made perhaps be of any use to the article? [ɛm nɹaɪkein] 03:56, 28 October 2011 (UTC)
— Preceding unsigned comment added by MNrykein ( talk • contribs) 03:56, 28 October 2011 (UTC)
I also created this world map for the remaining seats. Not sure how to add a second map to the Infobox.
-- Fjmustak ( talk) 05:40, 28 October 2011 (UTC)
Ghanoushi is the Nahda party leader, even if he is not being named to the post of Prime Minister, and should probably be changed back in the infobox. -- Fjmustak ( talk) 04:12, 28 October 2011 (UTC)
The head of the party may have asked for a withdrawal from all seats [2], I think we should wait before removing anything since there was no official decision yet and the elections committee still considers that Aridha won 19 seats. -- Tachfin ( talk) 07:40, 28 October 2011 (UTC)
Can I just put in a plea for more accurate orthography for Arabic names. In particular, it should read an-Nahda, and not al-Nahda. Rif Winfield ( talk) 07:49, 28 October 2011 (UTC)
![]() |
An image used in this article,
File:Hachimi.png, has been nominated for speedy deletion at
Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations
Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.
This notification is provided by a Bot -- CommonsNotificationBot ( talk) 12:42, 28 October 2011 (UTC) |
as per convention and as cited in the edit summaries the parties section comes BEFORE the result, this is precedent here on a host of election articles. Readers are not stupid that they cant see the result and decide for themselves per [3] Lihaas ( talk) 17:41, 30 October 2011 (UTC)
I removed the map under the infobox for two reasons: 1) it is outdated now that Aridha regained 7 seats; 2) from the map it looks as though it's only Ennahda that won seats in the blue districts. A map like this would be good if there was only one representative per district, but since each district has many representatives the map misleading. — ABJIKLAM ( t · c) 15:01, 9 November 2011 (UTC)
![]() |
An image used in this article,
File:Docteur Moncef Marzouki.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion at
Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations
Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.
This notification is provided by a Bot -- CommonsNotificationBot ( talk) 12:45, 28 November 2011 (UTC) |
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
Tunisian Constituent Assembly election, 2011. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 19:42, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
![]() | A news item involving 2011 Tunisian Constituent Assembly election was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the In the news section on 28 October 2011. | ![]() |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I think, for the sake of consistency, we should decide whether to change this article to Tunisian Constituent Assembly election, 2011 or change the article Tunisian Constituent Assembly election, 1956 to Tunisian Constitutional Assembly election, 1956. If no one disagrees, I will change this article's title in a week.
Do we know what voting system will be used for this election? The article should say what it is. -- Cabalamat ( talk) 17:35, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
As far as I can see, at the moment there are no results yet, at least none are mentioned in the text. However, the infobox orders several of the parties under headers "first party", "second party" and so on! I don't understand this nonsense!-- 93.104.105.168 ( talk) 20:47, 23 October 2011 (UTC)
In Kebili both Nahda and CPR won 2 seats each. I do not think that the map should show Nahda as the only winner in Kebili - Nahda and CPR are head to head. Kind regards -- RJFF ( talk) 18:50, 27 October 2011 (UTC)
Could this diagram I made perhaps be of any use to the article? [ɛm nɹaɪkein] 03:56, 28 October 2011 (UTC)
— Preceding unsigned comment added by MNrykein ( talk • contribs) 03:56, 28 October 2011 (UTC)
I also created this world map for the remaining seats. Not sure how to add a second map to the Infobox.
-- Fjmustak ( talk) 05:40, 28 October 2011 (UTC)
Ghanoushi is the Nahda party leader, even if he is not being named to the post of Prime Minister, and should probably be changed back in the infobox. -- Fjmustak ( talk) 04:12, 28 October 2011 (UTC)
The head of the party may have asked for a withdrawal from all seats [2], I think we should wait before removing anything since there was no official decision yet and the elections committee still considers that Aridha won 19 seats. -- Tachfin ( talk) 07:40, 28 October 2011 (UTC)
Can I just put in a plea for more accurate orthography for Arabic names. In particular, it should read an-Nahda, and not al-Nahda. Rif Winfield ( talk) 07:49, 28 October 2011 (UTC)
![]() |
An image used in this article,
File:Hachimi.png, has been nominated for speedy deletion at
Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations
Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.
This notification is provided by a Bot -- CommonsNotificationBot ( talk) 12:42, 28 October 2011 (UTC) |
as per convention and as cited in the edit summaries the parties section comes BEFORE the result, this is precedent here on a host of election articles. Readers are not stupid that they cant see the result and decide for themselves per [3] Lihaas ( talk) 17:41, 30 October 2011 (UTC)
I removed the map under the infobox for two reasons: 1) it is outdated now that Aridha regained 7 seats; 2) from the map it looks as though it's only Ennahda that won seats in the blue districts. A map like this would be good if there was only one representative per district, but since each district has many representatives the map misleading. — ABJIKLAM ( t · c) 15:01, 9 November 2011 (UTC)
![]() |
An image used in this article,
File:Docteur Moncef Marzouki.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion at
Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations
Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.
This notification is provided by a Bot -- CommonsNotificationBot ( talk) 12:45, 28 November 2011 (UTC) |
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
Tunisian Constituent Assembly election, 2011. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 19:42, 1 February 2016 (UTC)