@
SecretName101: The article has come a long way since the last GA nomination 6 months ago and it certainly looks GA quality from a general scan. I'll try and get this done as soon as possible, whilst still being thorough.
PoliceSheep99 (
talk)
19:54, 7 June 2020 (UTC)reply
it complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections
it complies with the manual of style guidelines for layout
it complies with the manual of style guidelines for words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation
Verifiable with no original research
it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline
all inline citations are from reliable sources, including those for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons—science-based articles should follow the scientific citation guidelines
My only concern here is that the section on the Republican primary relies heavily on one source, the Benton Spirit Newspaper, however there is nothing that would be likely to be challanged and the source itself appears reliable. From looking at the last GA review, it seems necessary to ensure a balance of coverage of both the Democrats and Republicans as all the sources are very
Buttigieg-heavy.
it contains no original research
No issues here.
it contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism
No issues here.
Broad in its coverage
it addresses the main aspects of the topic
This has been achieved, as mentioned in the previous section.
it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail
No issues here.
Neutral
it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.
Stable
it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute
No issues here.
Illustrated
media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content
media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions
My only suggestion here would be to attempt to find images of the other candidates if possible, as the last review pointed out.
@
SecretName101: The article has come a long way since the last GA nomination 6 months ago and it certainly looks GA quality from a general scan. I'll try and get this done as soon as possible, whilst still being thorough.
PoliceSheep99 (
talk)
19:54, 7 June 2020 (UTC)reply
it complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections
it complies with the manual of style guidelines for layout
it complies with the manual of style guidelines for words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation
Verifiable with no original research
it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline
all inline citations are from reliable sources, including those for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons—science-based articles should follow the scientific citation guidelines
My only concern here is that the section on the Republican primary relies heavily on one source, the Benton Spirit Newspaper, however there is nothing that would be likely to be challanged and the source itself appears reliable. From looking at the last GA review, it seems necessary to ensure a balance of coverage of both the Democrats and Republicans as all the sources are very
Buttigieg-heavy.
it contains no original research
No issues here.
it contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism
No issues here.
Broad in its coverage
it addresses the main aspects of the topic
This has been achieved, as mentioned in the previous section.
it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail
No issues here.
Neutral
it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.
Stable
it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute
No issues here.
Illustrated
media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content
media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions
My only suggestion here would be to attempt to find images of the other candidates if possible, as the last review pointed out.