From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

Article ( | visual edit | history) · Article talk ( | history) · Watch

Reviewer: GreatOrangePumpkin ( talk · contribs) 10:22, 26 July 2012 (UTC) reply

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b ( MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c ( OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
    File:Daniele Bennati-Vuelta a España 2011.jpg was nominated for deletion
    Deletion discussions in Commons are often extremely long, so I just hided it. As the article is very long, it may take some days to fully review it. Regards.-- Kürbis ( ) 13:51, 5 August 2012 (UTC) reply
    Surely you're not saying you're waiting for that deletion discussion to finish. I have replaced the image in the article. It's no longer relevant. Green-eyed girl ( Talk · Contribs) 19:34, 6 August 2012 (UTC) reply
    I did not say that I will wait until the discussion will be closed.-- Kürbis ( ) 17:58, 7 August 2012 (UTC) reply
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:


Looks like Craig got the remarks taken care of. I found a few other small errors (typos mostly). Green-eyed girl ( Talk · Contribs) 18:32, 11 August 2012 (UTC) reply

Pass Good work and a shame that it was so long in the queue. Regards.-- Kürbis ( ) 20:04, 11 August 2012 (UTC) reply
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

Article ( | visual edit | history) · Article talk ( | history) · Watch

Reviewer: GreatOrangePumpkin ( talk · contribs) 10:22, 26 July 2012 (UTC) reply

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b ( MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c ( OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
    File:Daniele Bennati-Vuelta a España 2011.jpg was nominated for deletion
    Deletion discussions in Commons are often extremely long, so I just hided it. As the article is very long, it may take some days to fully review it. Regards.-- Kürbis ( ) 13:51, 5 August 2012 (UTC) reply
    Surely you're not saying you're waiting for that deletion discussion to finish. I have replaced the image in the article. It's no longer relevant. Green-eyed girl ( Talk · Contribs) 19:34, 6 August 2012 (UTC) reply
    I did not say that I will wait until the discussion will be closed.-- Kürbis ( ) 17:58, 7 August 2012 (UTC) reply
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:


Looks like Craig got the remarks taken care of. I found a few other small errors (typos mostly). Green-eyed girl ( Talk · Contribs) 18:32, 11 August 2012 (UTC) reply

Pass Good work and a shame that it was so long in the queue. Regards.-- Kürbis ( ) 20:04, 11 August 2012 (UTC) reply

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook