Article ( | visual edit | history) · Article talk ( | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Dom497 ( talk · contribs) 03:59, 12 February 2012 (UTC) reply

Hello, I will be reviewing this article and let the nominator know what needs to be improved if needed. GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality: (Quality is very good.)

   B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists: (Article meets with this section of the review.)

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. References to sources: (All sources/references are reliable.)

   B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary: (Every statement has a reference/source.)

   C. No original research: (No original research was found.)

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects: (Article covers all the major aspects of the game. Talks about the rivalry, team info and match/game info.)

   B. Focused: (All the info in the article is all related to the topic.)

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias: (No bias found.)

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc: (Took a look at the article history and everything seems stable.)

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales: (All images appear to be licensed properly.)

   B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions: (All images are related to the article and a good amount of photos are also provided.)

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail: Very good and well written article. Really enjoyed reading and reviewing it...PASS!!!-- Dom497 ( talk) 21:25, 13 February 2012 (UTC) reply

   Thanks for taking the time for the review! It was much appreciated! Patriarca12 ( talk) 22:57, 13 February 2012 (UTC) reply