This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

U.S. Supreme Court cases Low‑importance This article is part of WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court cases, a collaborative effort to improve articles related to Supreme Court cases and the Supreme Court. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.U.S. Supreme Court casesWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court casesTemplate:WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court casesU.S. Supreme Court articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale. Lists Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. United States Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Should her dissents from the petitions to grant cert really be included? They aren't really 'opinions' in the real sense of its meaning. Lord Roem ( talk) 05:53, 27 December 2010 (UTC) reply

Yes they are; they are "opinions relating to orders", according to the Court itself. Why would you think otherwise? postdlf ( talk) 15:26, 27 December 2010 (UTC) reply

I was under the impression that they weren't actually opinions in that same sense. Apologies. Lord Roem ( talk) 15:50, 27 December 2010 (UTC) reply

My wrong impression came from this page [1] which did not include all opinions. Lord Roem ( talk) 04:42, 28 December 2010 (UTC) reply

Only eight cases are listed there because they're only listing the majority opinions (i.e., opinions of the Court) that Sotomayor authored, though regardless it just describes it as "cases for which there is a SCOTUSblog Case Page." Look instead to this list's reference section, which has three links to the Supreme Court's own website. postdlf ( talk) 05:02, 28 December 2010 (UTC) reply

Yes, I got it now. Sorry for the confusion. Lord Roem ( talk) 05:04, 28 December 2010 (UTC) reply