This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I repaired the link to the most recently cited Field Poll. The poll previously being cited here deals with the ballot initiatives (Propositions 20, 23, and 25) and it has nothing to do with the Attorney General's race. Lieutenant Governor & Attorney General poll. BluntDiplomat ( talk) 02:03, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
The trend in the percent margins may be of interest while the votes are being counted. Once the tally completes, the table can be deleted. Javaweb ( talk) 05:28, 8 November 2010 (UTC)Javaweb What do other editors think? Javaweb ( talk) 05:32, 8 November 2010 (UTC)Javaweb The Secretary of State publishes the interim tally. -- Javaweb ( talk) 19:39, 9 November 2010 (UTC)Javaweb
Trivia: The LA Times says tallying the 50 counties individually gets a more up-to-date tally than the Sec. of State because the latter lags in updating each county's totals. The LA Times says 11/11 Cooley + 28,591 +0.3%. -- Javaweb ( talk) 05:45, 12 November 2010 (UTC)Javaweb
The current table is too long. I've copied the vote table to California_Attorney_General_election,_2010/Vote_Table with the thought of retaining only the most current entries in this article's table and adding a statement: A table of the previous daily vote counts is here . Any opinions? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Javaweb ( talk • contribs) 00:58, 19 November 2010 (UTC)
My feeling is the table was "scaffolding" needed while the votes were counted so folks could see the tally trend. However, I purposely divorced it from the article so it could be deleted after the election was over but wanted to leave it to a consensus rather than delete it myself. Shorter articles are better than long ones and information that may have been fascinating before now becomes mere data clutter. I have copied the vote table to User:Javaweb/VoteTable You can use edit, copy and paste it somewhere if you wish to. I will delete my userspace copy in 5 days. -- Javaweb ( talk) 02:21, 7 December 2010 (UTC)Javaweb
@DGG, thanks for the subpage guidance. It will come in handy in the future. -- 99.66.147.87 ( talk) 20:39, 7 December 2010 (UTC)Javaweb
An image used in this article,
File:Kamala Harris Official Attorney General Photo.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion at
Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations
| |
Speedy deletions at commons tend to take longer than they do on Wikipedia, so there is no rush to respond. If you feel the deletion can be contested then please do so (
commons:COM:SPEEDY has further information). Otherwise consider finding a replacement image before deletion occurs.
This notification is provided by a Bot -- CommonsNotificationBot ( talk) 16:08, 5 August 2011 (UTC) |
I don’t think the Trump donation to Harris qualifies as an “endorsement” in the traditional sense. There’s basically no reporting on his donation before 2017, and the donation was not particularly publicized or mentioned at all during the campaign. A de facto private endorsement is not applicable. Dingers5Days ( talk) 04:33, 13 July 2022 (UTC)
The table for the Republican Party primary results at /info/en/?search=2010_California_Attorney_General_election#Results_2 refers to reference 8, which presumably should be a link to those results from the California Secretary of State's office, but instead the links are to the results of a 2012 Montana election at the Montana Secretary of State's office. Someone with more experience with Wikipedia should fix this (and perhaps ask the person who made the mistake to be more careful next time). 108.211.109.248 ( talk) 21:35, 28 January 2023 (UTC)
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I repaired the link to the most recently cited Field Poll. The poll previously being cited here deals with the ballot initiatives (Propositions 20, 23, and 25) and it has nothing to do with the Attorney General's race. Lieutenant Governor & Attorney General poll. BluntDiplomat ( talk) 02:03, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
The trend in the percent margins may be of interest while the votes are being counted. Once the tally completes, the table can be deleted. Javaweb ( talk) 05:28, 8 November 2010 (UTC)Javaweb What do other editors think? Javaweb ( talk) 05:32, 8 November 2010 (UTC)Javaweb The Secretary of State publishes the interim tally. -- Javaweb ( talk) 19:39, 9 November 2010 (UTC)Javaweb
Trivia: The LA Times says tallying the 50 counties individually gets a more up-to-date tally than the Sec. of State because the latter lags in updating each county's totals. The LA Times says 11/11 Cooley + 28,591 +0.3%. -- Javaweb ( talk) 05:45, 12 November 2010 (UTC)Javaweb
The current table is too long. I've copied the vote table to California_Attorney_General_election,_2010/Vote_Table with the thought of retaining only the most current entries in this article's table and adding a statement: A table of the previous daily vote counts is here . Any opinions? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Javaweb ( talk • contribs) 00:58, 19 November 2010 (UTC)
My feeling is the table was "scaffolding" needed while the votes were counted so folks could see the tally trend. However, I purposely divorced it from the article so it could be deleted after the election was over but wanted to leave it to a consensus rather than delete it myself. Shorter articles are better than long ones and information that may have been fascinating before now becomes mere data clutter. I have copied the vote table to User:Javaweb/VoteTable You can use edit, copy and paste it somewhere if you wish to. I will delete my userspace copy in 5 days. -- Javaweb ( talk) 02:21, 7 December 2010 (UTC)Javaweb
@DGG, thanks for the subpage guidance. It will come in handy in the future. -- 99.66.147.87 ( talk) 20:39, 7 December 2010 (UTC)Javaweb
An image used in this article,
File:Kamala Harris Official Attorney General Photo.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion at
Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations
| |
Speedy deletions at commons tend to take longer than they do on Wikipedia, so there is no rush to respond. If you feel the deletion can be contested then please do so (
commons:COM:SPEEDY has further information). Otherwise consider finding a replacement image before deletion occurs.
This notification is provided by a Bot -- CommonsNotificationBot ( talk) 16:08, 5 August 2011 (UTC) |
I don’t think the Trump donation to Harris qualifies as an “endorsement” in the traditional sense. There’s basically no reporting on his donation before 2017, and the donation was not particularly publicized or mentioned at all during the campaign. A de facto private endorsement is not applicable. Dingers5Days ( talk) 04:33, 13 July 2022 (UTC)
The table for the Republican Party primary results at /info/en/?search=2010_California_Attorney_General_election#Results_2 refers to reference 8, which presumably should be a link to those results from the California Secretary of State's office, but instead the links are to the results of a 2012 Montana election at the Montana Secretary of State's office. Someone with more experience with Wikipedia should fix this (and perhaps ask the person who made the mistake to be more careful next time). 108.211.109.248 ( talk) 21:35, 28 January 2023 (UTC)