![]() | 2009 Philadelphia Phillies season has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||
|
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Where would information such as this belong? In the post season section of this article, or after the World Series in the 2008 article? Mjf3719 ( talk) 18:25, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
Is today 10 November or 10 November? I think the unlinked version is more appropriate, as linking to a date doesn't really add anything to the article. I'm sure there's a WP Policy about it, but I don't know the term. I also don't want to start an edit-war just adding and removing links to dates. Mjf3719 ( talk) 21:07, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
"Gillick remains with the Phillies as an advisor." Currently, this is correct. But, in a few years, or many years, it's more appropriate to say "Gillick remained with the Phillies as an advisor." Since this is an article representing future/occuring events, should we be writing in the past tense to avoid short-term notability? Fightin' Phillie ( talk) 15:39, 12 December 2008 (UTC)
Contracts that aren't official shouldn't be added to the article until a reference can be provided that says they are official. This is per WP:OR and WP:CRYSTAL. KV5 • Squawk box • Fight on! 13:05, 16 December 2008 (UTC)
Information regarding Utley's injury should be restricted to facts released by the team or by his doctors. His own personal speculation is not verifiable and is therefore WP:OR. KV5 • Squawk box • Fight on! 13:05, 16 December 2008 (UTC)
"the opening night belongs before the rest of the season's games, though that section will later be merged into April 2009"
— KV5 in an edit summary
While I agree it should be before the regular season games, I think a brief description of the game is warranted (such as is done for post-season games). Opening Day is, afterall, a big day for any baseball team. I'm not sure if there's a reason not to, other than to avoid clutter by mentioning every game. Fightin' Phillie ( talk) 15:28, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
Hello! This is a friendly notice from OgreBot of upcoming automatic update of this page. Information is located WT:BASEBALL#Bot ready; please feel free to comment! OgreBot ( talk) 10:11, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
Reviewer: Reso lute 19:22, 14 February 2010 (UTC)
A rather thorough and well sourced article. I've got a few nitpicks below, but nothing that is preventing me from passing this article as a GA.
Comments:
Cheers, Reso lute 19:22, 14 February 2010 (UTC)
![]() |
An image used in this article,
File:RaulIbanez.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion at
Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations
|
Speedy deletions at commons tend to take longer than they do on Wikipedia, so there is no rush to respond. If you feel the deletion can be contested then please do so (
commons:COM:SPEEDY has further information). Otherwise consider finding a replacement image before deletion occurs.
This notification is provided by a Bot -- CommonsNotificationBot ( talk) 13:10, 8 June 2011 (UTC) |
A number of citations in this article unnecessarily include the publisher for periodicals and websites that have their own Wikipedia article. This information has no value to anyone wanting to check or track down references. For example, publisher=Washington Post Company for references to The Washington Post, or publisher=MLB Advanced Media for references to Baseball-Reference.com, only make the article longer - significantly longer when repeated many times - without adding anything useful. Therefore I plan to upgrade the article's citations to remove all such redundant publisher info, bringing them into line with the recommended use of the cite template (see Template:Citation#Publisher). Please raise any questions here or on my talk page. Colonies Chris ( talk) 21:39, 16 November 2012 (UTC)
![]() | 2009 Philadelphia Phillies season has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||
|
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Where would information such as this belong? In the post season section of this article, or after the World Series in the 2008 article? Mjf3719 ( talk) 18:25, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
Is today 10 November or 10 November? I think the unlinked version is more appropriate, as linking to a date doesn't really add anything to the article. I'm sure there's a WP Policy about it, but I don't know the term. I also don't want to start an edit-war just adding and removing links to dates. Mjf3719 ( talk) 21:07, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
"Gillick remains with the Phillies as an advisor." Currently, this is correct. But, in a few years, or many years, it's more appropriate to say "Gillick remained with the Phillies as an advisor." Since this is an article representing future/occuring events, should we be writing in the past tense to avoid short-term notability? Fightin' Phillie ( talk) 15:39, 12 December 2008 (UTC)
Contracts that aren't official shouldn't be added to the article until a reference can be provided that says they are official. This is per WP:OR and WP:CRYSTAL. KV5 • Squawk box • Fight on! 13:05, 16 December 2008 (UTC)
Information regarding Utley's injury should be restricted to facts released by the team or by his doctors. His own personal speculation is not verifiable and is therefore WP:OR. KV5 • Squawk box • Fight on! 13:05, 16 December 2008 (UTC)
"the opening night belongs before the rest of the season's games, though that section will later be merged into April 2009"
— KV5 in an edit summary
While I agree it should be before the regular season games, I think a brief description of the game is warranted (such as is done for post-season games). Opening Day is, afterall, a big day for any baseball team. I'm not sure if there's a reason not to, other than to avoid clutter by mentioning every game. Fightin' Phillie ( talk) 15:28, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
Hello! This is a friendly notice from OgreBot of upcoming automatic update of this page. Information is located WT:BASEBALL#Bot ready; please feel free to comment! OgreBot ( talk) 10:11, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
Reviewer: Reso lute 19:22, 14 February 2010 (UTC)
A rather thorough and well sourced article. I've got a few nitpicks below, but nothing that is preventing me from passing this article as a GA.
Comments:
Cheers, Reso lute 19:22, 14 February 2010 (UTC)
![]() |
An image used in this article,
File:RaulIbanez.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion at
Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations
|
Speedy deletions at commons tend to take longer than they do on Wikipedia, so there is no rush to respond. If you feel the deletion can be contested then please do so (
commons:COM:SPEEDY has further information). Otherwise consider finding a replacement image before deletion occurs.
This notification is provided by a Bot -- CommonsNotificationBot ( talk) 13:10, 8 June 2011 (UTC) |
A number of citations in this article unnecessarily include the publisher for periodicals and websites that have their own Wikipedia article. This information has no value to anyone wanting to check or track down references. For example, publisher=Washington Post Company for references to The Washington Post, or publisher=MLB Advanced Media for references to Baseball-Reference.com, only make the article longer - significantly longer when repeated many times - without adding anything useful. Therefore I plan to upgrade the article's citations to remove all such redundant publisher info, bringing them into line with the recommended use of the cite template (see Template:Citation#Publisher). Please raise any questions here or on my talk page. Colonies Chris ( talk) 21:39, 16 November 2012 (UTC)