This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2009 Norwegian parliamentary election received a peer review by Wikipedia editors, which is now archived. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article. |
The "individual polls" section is taking up enormous amounts of space, and without very much importance. The average of polls gives some information about actual trends, but any individual poll in itself is pretty worthless. Also, it seems entirely random which polls get included on this page (there are 9 or 10 every month). I suggest establishing a page opinion polling for the norwegian parliamentary election, 2009 or something of the sort and moving all the individual polls there, keeping only the average of polls on this page. Alternately, delete them altoghether.-- Barend ( talk) 07:54, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
I have never known Wikipedia to be so tardy. -- Mais oui! ( talk) 06:26, 15 September 2009 (UTC)
Even more blatantly than last time, the left has won the election only because the electoral system is rigged in favour of the northern districts. Norway really doesn't deserve to be called a democracy after this result. Intelligent Mr Toad ( talk) 12:15, 17 September 2009 (UTC)
There are lots of fascinating and detailed maps now in the article, but would it be possible to have a simple "at a glance" summary like File:Norwegianelection2005.png that is used in Norwegian parliamentary election, 2005? TheGrappler ( talk) 17:30, 20 September 2009 (UTC)
The infobox doesn't make any sense. I'd fix it, but I don't know what it's trying to say. Wikipeterproject ( talk) 17:49, 20 September 2009 (UTC)
I created a chart for the Media of Norway-article, showing the complete differences between the Norwegian public and Norwegian journalists political sympaties. I don't know if it can be implemented here, but it might be interesting and relevant. - GabaG ( talk) 12:27, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
I recently updated the infobox to this [5], similarly to electoral infoboxes in all other countries. However my edit was quickly reverted [6], apparently because "Changes to the infobox clutter the page. the added information can easily be found in". So, I wonder why Norway is not allowed to have an equal infobox to all other countries when it comes to elections, and if the stupid reason given to the revert I wonder why the infobox exist at all. The infobox now just consit of some meaningless stuff, saying only standar-template stuff like "Incumbent Prime Minister" and "Prime Minister-designate". - GabaG ( talk) 17:48, 20 November 2009 (UTC)
My apologies. Should have checked this better. Wikipeterproject ( talk) 20:26, 21 November 2009 (UTC)
Ok, with the big edit recently I firstly have to say nice job. However, I found some big issues:
I'll raise questions here as I encounter them, Please would you let each bullet start its own thread – it keeps discussions easier to follow.
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
Norwegian parliamentary election, 2009. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 17:06, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Norwegian parliamentary election, 2009. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 05:46, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2009 Norwegian parliamentary election received a peer review by Wikipedia editors, which is now archived. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article. |
The "individual polls" section is taking up enormous amounts of space, and without very much importance. The average of polls gives some information about actual trends, but any individual poll in itself is pretty worthless. Also, it seems entirely random which polls get included on this page (there are 9 or 10 every month). I suggest establishing a page opinion polling for the norwegian parliamentary election, 2009 or something of the sort and moving all the individual polls there, keeping only the average of polls on this page. Alternately, delete them altoghether.-- Barend ( talk) 07:54, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
I have never known Wikipedia to be so tardy. -- Mais oui! ( talk) 06:26, 15 September 2009 (UTC)
Even more blatantly than last time, the left has won the election only because the electoral system is rigged in favour of the northern districts. Norway really doesn't deserve to be called a democracy after this result. Intelligent Mr Toad ( talk) 12:15, 17 September 2009 (UTC)
There are lots of fascinating and detailed maps now in the article, but would it be possible to have a simple "at a glance" summary like File:Norwegianelection2005.png that is used in Norwegian parliamentary election, 2005? TheGrappler ( talk) 17:30, 20 September 2009 (UTC)
The infobox doesn't make any sense. I'd fix it, but I don't know what it's trying to say. Wikipeterproject ( talk) 17:49, 20 September 2009 (UTC)
I created a chart for the Media of Norway-article, showing the complete differences between the Norwegian public and Norwegian journalists political sympaties. I don't know if it can be implemented here, but it might be interesting and relevant. - GabaG ( talk) 12:27, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
I recently updated the infobox to this [5], similarly to electoral infoboxes in all other countries. However my edit was quickly reverted [6], apparently because "Changes to the infobox clutter the page. the added information can easily be found in". So, I wonder why Norway is not allowed to have an equal infobox to all other countries when it comes to elections, and if the stupid reason given to the revert I wonder why the infobox exist at all. The infobox now just consit of some meaningless stuff, saying only standar-template stuff like "Incumbent Prime Minister" and "Prime Minister-designate". - GabaG ( talk) 17:48, 20 November 2009 (UTC)
My apologies. Should have checked this better. Wikipeterproject ( talk) 20:26, 21 November 2009 (UTC)
Ok, with the big edit recently I firstly have to say nice job. However, I found some big issues:
I'll raise questions here as I encounter them, Please would you let each bullet start its own thread – it keeps discussions easier to follow.
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
Norwegian parliamentary election, 2009. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 17:06, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Norwegian parliamentary election, 2009. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 05:46, 13 January 2017 (UTC)