![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The current layout of the top scorers section is currently not in line with Wikipedia's Manual of Style, as it violates WP:TABLE since this is a very easy table. I suggest to replace it with a list structure similar to the ones in the Bundesliga or Serie A articles.
Further, I would suggest to keep this list limited to the top 15 goalscorers only, as nearly every player on a professional level might be able to score here and then. However, if the community wants to keep the whole list, it should be renamed "Scorers" as the current title is misleading.
Finally: Add a source for the scorers! Hockey-holic ( talk) 19:20, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
Dear Serbian "goalscorers" contributors,
after your recent edit war over tiny details I had a closer look at the whole "Goalscorers" section. Result: No source was cited, a violation of the verifiability policy. After that, I first checked if the current league table was fully correct. This was the case, so I then summed up the goals from the table and compared that number against the sum of goals credited in the "Goalscorers" section. Result: Table 307, Goalscorer section 304.
To cut a long story short - either you come up with a reliable source for the whole list (and, of course, correct the list) within four full days from now (19:22, 12 April 2009 (UTC)), or the section content which is not verifiable will be removed per the respective policy. -- Soccer-holic I hear voices in my head... 19:22, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
If the relegation playoff team wins the 2 legged playoff against the winner of the 3rd-6th place team in the lower division, do they stay in the top division? – Michael ( talk) 02:00, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
Socer-Holic, give it a rest. Your primary concern should be improving the article, not cutting it up over ridiculous bureaucracy. Did you somehow think this list magically came to somebody in their dream? If you bothered to look in the history you would have noticed that it's been updated week after week since August 2008 as the fixtures were played, so obviously nobody pulled this info out of their ass.
The link I provided contains match reports of every Superliga 2008-09 match from week 1 to week 26, and, yes, it includes all the goalscorers. Happy now, robot? Zvonko ( talk) 02:37, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
I just think that having mentioned the players that already left was a good idea. This way it looks like they continue in Superliga but not scoring... The * on the player and the list with the transfered players from the list was not bad. FkpCascais ( talk) 21:49, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The current layout of the top scorers section is currently not in line with Wikipedia's Manual of Style, as it violates WP:TABLE since this is a very easy table. I suggest to replace it with a list structure similar to the ones in the Bundesliga or Serie A articles.
Further, I would suggest to keep this list limited to the top 15 goalscorers only, as nearly every player on a professional level might be able to score here and then. However, if the community wants to keep the whole list, it should be renamed "Scorers" as the current title is misleading.
Finally: Add a source for the scorers! Hockey-holic ( talk) 19:20, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
Dear Serbian "goalscorers" contributors,
after your recent edit war over tiny details I had a closer look at the whole "Goalscorers" section. Result: No source was cited, a violation of the verifiability policy. After that, I first checked if the current league table was fully correct. This was the case, so I then summed up the goals from the table and compared that number against the sum of goals credited in the "Goalscorers" section. Result: Table 307, Goalscorer section 304.
To cut a long story short - either you come up with a reliable source for the whole list (and, of course, correct the list) within four full days from now (19:22, 12 April 2009 (UTC)), or the section content which is not verifiable will be removed per the respective policy. -- Soccer-holic I hear voices in my head... 19:22, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
If the relegation playoff team wins the 2 legged playoff against the winner of the 3rd-6th place team in the lower division, do they stay in the top division? – Michael ( talk) 02:00, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
Socer-Holic, give it a rest. Your primary concern should be improving the article, not cutting it up over ridiculous bureaucracy. Did you somehow think this list magically came to somebody in their dream? If you bothered to look in the history you would have noticed that it's been updated week after week since August 2008 as the fixtures were played, so obviously nobody pulled this info out of their ass.
The link I provided contains match reports of every Superliga 2008-09 match from week 1 to week 26, and, yes, it includes all the goalscorers. Happy now, robot? Zvonko ( talk) 02:37, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
I just think that having mentioned the players that already left was a good idea. This way it looks like they continue in Superliga but not scoring... The * on the player and the list with the transfered players from the list was not bad. FkpCascais ( talk) 21:49, 1 May 2009 (UTC)