2007 Slovenian presidential election has been listed as one of the Social sciences and society good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
In the last revision I edited, I found duplicate named references, i.e. references sharing the same name, but not having the same content. Please check them, as I am not able to fix them automatically :)
DumZiBoT ( talk) 11:37, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
Reference 28, links to http://www.wieninternational.at/de/node/5017. Checked on two computers. -- Eleassar my talk 08:15, 23 September 2008 (UTC)
The same problem with reference 52, links to http://www.wieninternational.at/en/node/5822. This one should be verified too. Perhaps your browser is displaying a cached version of this page or something. I've tried this now with Opera too. -- Eleassar my talk 10:46, 23 September 2008 (UTC)
Note: I am having no problems with these links Scapler ( talk) 23:40, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
The template I added at the top of the page needs to be ammended; I cannot be editing constantly so 'remove this template if the page has not been edited in several hours' (or something like that) is no longer valid, cheers. Wikisaver62 ( talk) 17:09, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
Done per Tone's recent request on my talk page. – ukexpat ( talk) 17:40, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
I will be happy to review for GAC. H1nkles ( talk) 18:40, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
When I do an article review I like to provide a Heading-by-Heading breakdown of suggestions for how to make the article better. It is done in good faith as a means to improve the article. It does not mean that the article is not GA quality, or that the issues listed are keeping it from GA approval. I also undertake minor grammatical and prose edits. After I finish this part of the review I will look at the over arching quality of the article in light of the GA criteria and make my determination as to the overall quality of the article.
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
This subsection is fine. H1nkles ( talk) 21:42, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
This section is fine, wikilinking spoof is a little odd but I can see rationale for doing it. H1nkles ( talk) 21:49, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
I can't find much wrong with this section. It looks pretty good. H1nkles ( talk) 22:13, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
This section is fine as well, I did some minor grammatical edits but otherwise it's ok and the map is great. H1nkles ( talk) 22:26, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
Table is good and sourced. H1nkles ( talk) 23:06, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
Thank you for your comments. It will take me some time to go through all of them and I am a bit busy these days so maybe I'll need more than a week. I'll let you know when I'm done. Greetings. -- Tone 21:29, 30 January 2009 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
Slovenian presidential election, 2007. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 07:52, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
2007 Slovenian presidential election has been listed as one of the Social sciences and society good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
In the last revision I edited, I found duplicate named references, i.e. references sharing the same name, but not having the same content. Please check them, as I am not able to fix them automatically :)
DumZiBoT ( talk) 11:37, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
Reference 28, links to http://www.wieninternational.at/de/node/5017. Checked on two computers. -- Eleassar my talk 08:15, 23 September 2008 (UTC)
The same problem with reference 52, links to http://www.wieninternational.at/en/node/5822. This one should be verified too. Perhaps your browser is displaying a cached version of this page or something. I've tried this now with Opera too. -- Eleassar my talk 10:46, 23 September 2008 (UTC)
Note: I am having no problems with these links Scapler ( talk) 23:40, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
The template I added at the top of the page needs to be ammended; I cannot be editing constantly so 'remove this template if the page has not been edited in several hours' (or something like that) is no longer valid, cheers. Wikisaver62 ( talk) 17:09, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
Done per Tone's recent request on my talk page. – ukexpat ( talk) 17:40, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
I will be happy to review for GAC. H1nkles ( talk) 18:40, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
When I do an article review I like to provide a Heading-by-Heading breakdown of suggestions for how to make the article better. It is done in good faith as a means to improve the article. It does not mean that the article is not GA quality, or that the issues listed are keeping it from GA approval. I also undertake minor grammatical and prose edits. After I finish this part of the review I will look at the over arching quality of the article in light of the GA criteria and make my determination as to the overall quality of the article.
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
This subsection is fine. H1nkles ( talk) 21:42, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
This section is fine, wikilinking spoof is a little odd but I can see rationale for doing it. H1nkles ( talk) 21:49, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
I can't find much wrong with this section. It looks pretty good. H1nkles ( talk) 22:13, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
This section is fine as well, I did some minor grammatical edits but otherwise it's ok and the map is great. H1nkles ( talk) 22:26, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
Table is good and sourced. H1nkles ( talk) 23:06, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
Thank you for your comments. It will take me some time to go through all of them and I am a bit busy these days so maybe I'll need more than a week. I'll let you know when I'm done. Greetings. -- Tone 21:29, 30 January 2009 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
Slovenian presidential election, 2007. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 07:52, 18 January 2016 (UTC)