Warning: active arbitration remedies The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article is related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, which is a contentious topic. Furthermore, the following rules apply when editing this article:
Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page.
|
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Certain parts of the article indicate a clear political slant---rvitelli — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rvitelli ( talk • contribs) 15:23, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
I have been forced to revert User:Doom's constant meddling with the text because it is performed without explanation. The original text was drafted according to the sources cited in references, following closely the language there. It is not, I repeat, not POV to call an Arab of an area defined as 'Palestine' or the Palestyine Occupied Territories, as a Palestinian. It is not POV to note that newspaper reports refer to his death as a 'suicide'. It is POV to say he was killed when no authoritative sources confirm this. Please document changes according to WP:RS. And edit step by step so one can follow the reasons behind what you are doing. Nishidani ( talk) 09:01, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
Someone is playing with the cats and thinks 'only' four dead means one cannot tag it as mass murder. This defies the technical literature which defines mass murder as from 3-4 in any one place and time. SeeRonald M.Holmes, Stephen T.Holmes, Murder in America, Sage Publications, London 2nd ed. p.54ff. 3-4 = mass murder — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nishidani ( talk • contribs) 16:08, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
Per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2005 Shiloh settlement shooting I would like to rename this article 2005 Shiloh shooting. The discussion showed many editors in favor of the reverse merge and others in favor of renaming, and between them, there was a definite majority for this rename. Debresser ( talk) 20:13, 4 August 2018 (UTC)
On 15 September 2020, Inter&anthro ( talk · contribs) added the category of Zionist terrorism to the article, saying "mentioned and sourced in the article". There's no prose in the article describing this as Zionist political violence, and for us to do so is original research. I'm inclined to remove the addition; does anybody object? — Fourthords | =Λ= | 20:11, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
to stop the Israeli disengagement from Gaza. Does the prose, any of the sources in the article, or any supplemental sources specifically say that Weisgan's religion (or any religion of his targets) were relevant to the attack? To put it another way: Weisgan was also a 'male terrorist', but that doesn't mean his gender or sex had anything to do with the attack. — Fourthords | =Λ= | 02:16, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
I recognize that my inquiry turned into a discussion only with the involved editor, but if anybody has any reliable sources that explicitly state Mr. Weisgan's religion had any specific bearing on the attack, please comment below in an effort to retain these edits. Thanks all. — Fourthords | =Λ= | 05:12, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Warning: active arbitration remedies The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article is related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, which is a contentious topic. Furthermore, the following rules apply when editing this article:
Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page.
|
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Certain parts of the article indicate a clear political slant---rvitelli — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rvitelli ( talk • contribs) 15:23, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
I have been forced to revert User:Doom's constant meddling with the text because it is performed without explanation. The original text was drafted according to the sources cited in references, following closely the language there. It is not, I repeat, not POV to call an Arab of an area defined as 'Palestine' or the Palestyine Occupied Territories, as a Palestinian. It is not POV to note that newspaper reports refer to his death as a 'suicide'. It is POV to say he was killed when no authoritative sources confirm this. Please document changes according to WP:RS. And edit step by step so one can follow the reasons behind what you are doing. Nishidani ( talk) 09:01, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
Someone is playing with the cats and thinks 'only' four dead means one cannot tag it as mass murder. This defies the technical literature which defines mass murder as from 3-4 in any one place and time. SeeRonald M.Holmes, Stephen T.Holmes, Murder in America, Sage Publications, London 2nd ed. p.54ff. 3-4 = mass murder — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nishidani ( talk • contribs) 16:08, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
Per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2005 Shiloh settlement shooting I would like to rename this article 2005 Shiloh shooting. The discussion showed many editors in favor of the reverse merge and others in favor of renaming, and between them, there was a definite majority for this rename. Debresser ( talk) 20:13, 4 August 2018 (UTC)
On 15 September 2020, Inter&anthro ( talk · contribs) added the category of Zionist terrorism to the article, saying "mentioned and sourced in the article". There's no prose in the article describing this as Zionist political violence, and for us to do so is original research. I'm inclined to remove the addition; does anybody object? — Fourthords | =Λ= | 20:11, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
to stop the Israeli disengagement from Gaza. Does the prose, any of the sources in the article, or any supplemental sources specifically say that Weisgan's religion (or any religion of his targets) were relevant to the attack? To put it another way: Weisgan was also a 'male terrorist', but that doesn't mean his gender or sex had anything to do with the attack. — Fourthords | =Λ= | 02:16, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
I recognize that my inquiry turned into a discussion only with the involved editor, but if anybody has any reliable sources that explicitly state Mr. Weisgan's religion had any specific bearing on the attack, please comment below in an effort to retain these edits. Thanks all. — Fourthords | =Λ= | 05:12, 22 September 2020 (UTC)