From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

Article ( | visual edit | history) · Article talk ( | history) · Watch

Reviewer: MWright96 ( talk · contribs) 08:53, 2 October 2020 (UTC) reply

Going to review for the GAN October 2020 Backlog Drive. MWright96 (talk) 08:53, 2 October 2020 (UTC) reply

  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b ( MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a ( reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c ( OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a ( major aspects): b ( focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b ( appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:

Lead

Route to the final

Background

Summary

Post-match

Reference

Am putting the review hold to allow the nominator to address or query the points raised above. MWright96 (talk) 11:53, 2 October 2020 (UTC) reply

Cheers, MWright96, all addressed and/or responded to. Thanks for your review. The Rambling Man ( Hands! Face! Space!!!!) 16:54, 2 October 2020 (UTC) reply
@ The Rambling Man: Now promoting to GA class. MWright96 (talk) 17:34, 2 October 2020 (UTC) reply
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

Article ( | visual edit | history) · Article talk ( | history) · Watch

Reviewer: MWright96 ( talk · contribs) 08:53, 2 October 2020 (UTC) reply

Going to review for the GAN October 2020 Backlog Drive. MWright96 (talk) 08:53, 2 October 2020 (UTC) reply

  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b ( MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a ( reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c ( OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a ( major aspects): b ( focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b ( appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:

Lead

Route to the final

Background

Summary

Post-match

Reference

Am putting the review hold to allow the nominator to address or query the points raised above. MWright96 (talk) 11:53, 2 October 2020 (UTC) reply

Cheers, MWright96, all addressed and/or responded to. Thanks for your review. The Rambling Man ( Hands! Face! Space!!!!) 16:54, 2 October 2020 (UTC) reply
@ The Rambling Man: Now promoting to GA class. MWright96 (talk) 17:34, 2 October 2020 (UTC) reply

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook