I have created a blank map from de:Bild:Indischer Ozean Beben2004.png. It's a good map. Anyone cared to finish this job? I have to do my own job now. -- Toytoy 08:20, Dec 27, 2004 (UTC)
I have removed the image gallery from my website and uploaded the photos to the commons at commons:2004 Indian Ocean earthquake, all under GFDL. Please use any of those images if you prefer. Matthewmayer 13:10, 27 Dec 2004 (UTC)
There is a massive photoarchive of the tsunami Disaster here at www.photoduck.com/pollyfodder
Has anyone seen video of this Tsuanmi on the web? If so please leave the link. I have been unsucesful in finding any.
Thanks
Some of these images appear to be edited/fake. http://www.waveofdestruction.org/photos
I recieved those pictures via email a a couple days after the site launched and I put them online, the next day I was informed by many of my readers that the images are from a tidal surge in China (or the surrounding areas).
Straight away I relabeled all the images to reflect this discovery, the only reason they are still in the gallery is to let ppls know of the error.
Hope that clears it up.
http://www.digitalglobe.com/tsunami_gallery.html - Include these?
Has anyone else noticed that there are some strange things about the flash animation of the tsunami's path, the one we got from NOAA. That would be one. If you look at it carefully, the tsunami originates from where the 2 6-magnitude earthquakes are, north of the epicenter by quite a bit, just off the islands. The damage done in Aceh by a tsunami originating there should have been significantly smaller than it was, and the damage done in Bangladesh should have been significantly larger. Also, the tsunami seems to stop just off the coast of Bangladesh and wait for the rest of it to hit Sri_Lanka, which is odd since there's no evidence that I can find of significant coral reefs there to slow down the wave. In all, this looks like a very badly done creation, or at least like there's a huge disconnect between the animation and the story.
I have created a blank map from de:Bild:Indischer Ozean Beben2004.png. It's a good map. Anyone cared to finish this job? I have to do my own job now. -- Toytoy 08:20, Dec 27, 2004 (UTC)
I have removed the image gallery from my website and uploaded the photos to the commons at commons:2004 Indian Ocean earthquake, all under GFDL. Please use any of those images if you prefer. Matthewmayer 13:10, 27 Dec 2004 (UTC)
There is a massive photoarchive of the tsunami Disaster here at www.photoduck.com/pollyfodder
Has anyone seen video of this Tsuanmi on the web? If so please leave the link. I have been unsucesful in finding any.
Thanks
Some of these images appear to be edited/fake. http://www.waveofdestruction.org/photos
I recieved those pictures via email a a couple days after the site launched and I put them online, the next day I was informed by many of my readers that the images are from a tidal surge in China (or the surrounding areas).
Straight away I relabeled all the images to reflect this discovery, the only reason they are still in the gallery is to let ppls know of the error.
Hope that clears it up.
http://www.digitalglobe.com/tsunami_gallery.html - Include these?
Has anyone else noticed that there are some strange things about the flash animation of the tsunami's path, the one we got from NOAA. That would be one. If you look at it carefully, the tsunami originates from where the 2 6-magnitude earthquakes are, north of the epicenter by quite a bit, just off the islands. The damage done in Aceh by a tsunami originating there should have been significantly smaller than it was, and the damage done in Bangladesh should have been significantly larger. Also, the tsunami seems to stop just off the coast of Bangladesh and wait for the rest of it to hit Sri_Lanka, which is odd since there's no evidence that I can find of significant coral reefs there to slow down the wave. In all, this looks like a very badly done creation, or at least like there's a huge disconnect between the animation and the story.