This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Africa: Equatorial Guinea Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject AfricaTemplate:WikiProject AfricaAfrica articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Equatorial Guinea (assessed as High-importance).

Daily pageviews of this article A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org

Parts of this article such as the discussion about UK prior knowledge sound biased.-- 69.132.212.35 01:34, 14 October 2007 (UTC) reply

i disagree, also all sourced information. Chendy ( talk) 13:59, 18 January 2008 (UTC) reply

Source or no source, it may be unwise to base such a disproportionate amount of the article on the viewpoints of the Guardian. QatBurglar ( talk) 03:22, 16 June 2008 (UTC) reply

This plot sounds like the plot of the Fredrick Forsythe story, Dogs of war. Also, I read somewhere that one of the guys had that book on his person when they were arrested. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 205.250.62.216 ( talk) 08:06, 10 May 2008 (UTC) reply

I am currently reading the book "The Wonga Coup" by Adam Roberts which tells the long and sordid tale. Once I finish reading, I will update this page with the things I have learned. Until then, adieu. QatBurglar ( talk) 03:18, 16 June 2008 (UTC) reply