A fact from 2004–05 Arsenal F.C. season appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 13 November 2015 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
2004–05 Arsenal F.C. season has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||||||
2004–05 Arsenal F.C. season is the main article in the 2004–05 Arsenal F.C. season series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so. | |||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
Current status: Good article |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Casliber ( talk · contribs) 11:47, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
Right, I will take a look at this, make straightforward copyedits as I go (please revert if I accidentally change the meaning!) and jot questions below:
Cas Liber (
talk ·
contribs) 11:47, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
Otherwise looks ok. Cas Liber ( talk · contribs) 11:56, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
Also, Earwig's copyvio checker passed ok.
1. Well written?:
2. Factually accurate and verifiable?:
3. Broad in coverage?:
4. Reflects a neutral point of view?:
5. Reasonably stable?
6. Illustrated by images, when possible and appropriate?:
Overall:
A fact from 2004–05 Arsenal F.C. season appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 13 November 2015 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
2004–05 Arsenal F.C. season has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||||||
2004–05 Arsenal F.C. season is the main article in the 2004–05 Arsenal F.C. season series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so. | |||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
Current status: Good article |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Casliber ( talk · contribs) 11:47, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
Right, I will take a look at this, make straightforward copyedits as I go (please revert if I accidentally change the meaning!) and jot questions below:
Cas Liber (
talk ·
contribs) 11:47, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
Otherwise looks ok. Cas Liber ( talk · contribs) 11:56, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
Also, Earwig's copyvio checker passed ok.
1. Well written?:
2. Factually accurate and verifiable?:
3. Broad in coverage?:
4. Reflects a neutral point of view?:
5. Reasonably stable?
6. Illustrated by images, when possible and appropriate?:
Overall: