From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Lack of Credible Sources

This article's sources are non-academic and rely too heavily upon journalistic information. Greater weight should be given to textual information. Hughes.david.alan ( talk) 22:08, 19 March 2009 (UTC) reply

This should be deleted and just redone

The amount of personal viewpoints, uncited sources, and weasel words in this is staggering. Even the bold letters the highlight "failed" is comical. It would be best to just start over. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.187.116.238 ( talk) 11:43, 30 August 2012 (UTC) reply

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Lack of Credible Sources

This article's sources are non-academic and rely too heavily upon journalistic information. Greater weight should be given to textual information. Hughes.david.alan ( talk) 22:08, 19 March 2009 (UTC) reply

This should be deleted and just redone

The amount of personal viewpoints, uncited sources, and weasel words in this is staggering. Even the bold letters the highlight "failed" is comical. It would be best to just start over. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.187.116.238 ( talk) 11:43, 30 August 2012 (UTC) reply


Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook