This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
I would reeeeeally like to know where the original 2 \pi theorem was originally stated!
Morevoer: I guess that
"A horoball packing argument due to Thurston shows that there are at most 48 slopes to avoid on each cusp to get a nonhyperbolic 3-manifold"
should be corrected as: "... to get a HYPERBOLIC 3-manifold" -- 151.29.138.43 ( talk) 23:10, 10 April 2016 (UTC)
This is a horribly written page. If someone didn't know what this was already, this would be way over their head. A mathematician wouldn't need this page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.91.130.247 ( talk)
Is there a way to graph this? It sounds like something in 3D or greater. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Reddwarf2956 ( talk • contribs) 01:11, 23 August 2012 (UTC)
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
I would reeeeeally like to know where the original 2 \pi theorem was originally stated!
Morevoer: I guess that
"A horoball packing argument due to Thurston shows that there are at most 48 slopes to avoid on each cusp to get a nonhyperbolic 3-manifold"
should be corrected as: "... to get a HYPERBOLIC 3-manifold" -- 151.29.138.43 ( talk) 23:10, 10 April 2016 (UTC)
This is a horribly written page. If someone didn't know what this was already, this would be way over their head. A mathematician wouldn't need this page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.91.130.247 ( talk)
Is there a way to graph this? It sounds like something in 3D or greater. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Reddwarf2956 ( talk • contribs) 01:11, 23 August 2012 (UTC)