This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodibenzodioxin article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find medical sources: Source guidelines · PubMed · Cochrane · DOAJ · Gale · OpenMD · ScienceDirect · Springer · Trip · Wiley · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | 2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodibenzodioxin has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||
|
Revision on the sources of TCDDs is misleading here and belongs to Dioxins and dioxin-like compounds. TCDD as defined here, is a single compound 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin, and the sources given are common to many related compounds. The sole sources of pure TCDD are accidents (Seveso) or deliberate poisonings as described. Please check Dioxins and dioxin-like compounds, and add the necessary sources there. Viinamakelainen ( talk) 19:05, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
Thanks for working on this article! It looks very good and the sourcing appears excellent. The lead, the most important part of the article, needs to be expanded to adequately summarize all the article content per WP:LEAD. Best regards Hekerui ( talk) 12:38, 28 September 2012 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Jasper Deng ( talk · contribs) 23:32, 13 October 2012 (UTC)
Disclaimer: I am not an expert in chemistry, especially organic chemistry. The assessment is partly based on how other organic chemistry articles were assessed. Please feel free to request a second opinion if you feel that mine was not adequate.
The article contains a section on 2,3,7,8-TCDD accumulation in sugarcane. This section is sourced but extremely poorly written. It's difficult to decipher its meaning and it is not up to the quality of the rest of the article. I'm on the fence about whether it should be removed or rewritten. On one hand it seems a bit odd to have an entire section devoted to sugarcane, but on the other it is at least nominally relevant information. Thoughts? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.244.23.129 ( talk) 22:36, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
You are right. Sugarcane does not belong here, it could be shortly mentioned in Dioxins and dioxin-like compounds, even if it is trivial as a source of dioxins. I am editing both entries shortly and plan to delete it here. Viinamakelainen ( talk) 18:26, 20 February 2020 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodibenzodioxin article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find medical sources: Source guidelines · PubMed · Cochrane · DOAJ · Gale · OpenMD · ScienceDirect · Springer · Trip · Wiley · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | 2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodibenzodioxin has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||
|
Revision on the sources of TCDDs is misleading here and belongs to Dioxins and dioxin-like compounds. TCDD as defined here, is a single compound 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin, and the sources given are common to many related compounds. The sole sources of pure TCDD are accidents (Seveso) or deliberate poisonings as described. Please check Dioxins and dioxin-like compounds, and add the necessary sources there. Viinamakelainen ( talk) 19:05, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
Thanks for working on this article! It looks very good and the sourcing appears excellent. The lead, the most important part of the article, needs to be expanded to adequately summarize all the article content per WP:LEAD. Best regards Hekerui ( talk) 12:38, 28 September 2012 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Jasper Deng ( talk · contribs) 23:32, 13 October 2012 (UTC)
Disclaimer: I am not an expert in chemistry, especially organic chemistry. The assessment is partly based on how other organic chemistry articles were assessed. Please feel free to request a second opinion if you feel that mine was not adequate.
The article contains a section on 2,3,7,8-TCDD accumulation in sugarcane. This section is sourced but extremely poorly written. It's difficult to decipher its meaning and it is not up to the quality of the rest of the article. I'm on the fence about whether it should be removed or rewritten. On one hand it seems a bit odd to have an entire section devoted to sugarcane, but on the other it is at least nominally relevant information. Thoughts? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.244.23.129 ( talk) 22:36, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
You are right. Sugarcane does not belong here, it could be shortly mentioned in Dioxins and dioxin-like compounds, even if it is trivial as a source of dioxins. I am editing both entries shortly and plan to delete it here. Viinamakelainen ( talk) 18:26, 20 February 2020 (UTC)