![]() | This article is written in British English with Oxford spelling (colour, realize, organization, analyse; note that -ize is used instead of -ise) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
|
"Google later admitted that this was a joke."
That links to an unconfirmed CNET report. Google's communications team confirmed for me yesterday that it was actually true! YouTube had to upgrade to 64-bit to handle the view count of "Gangnam Style." I wrote about it on Quartz here:
https://qz.com/1005230/chess-coms-ios-app-inadvertently-broke-the-mathematical-limits-of-older-apple-devices/ this is fake info — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:1C1:8B01:AE40:456B:5B09:88C3:BE3B ( talk) 16:59, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
The iOS app for Chess.com hit the 32-bit limit of 2,147,483,647 on June 10, 2017. For 32-bit iPhones and iPads made before mid-2013, the app stopped working. There are more details in the Quartz article I linked to above:
2147483647 can also be a phone number. 214-748 (3647) LoganDark 10:20, Sept 4, 2014 (ULT User's Local Time) — Preceding undated comment added 17:19, 4 September 2014 (UTC)
Is this page really necessary? Jgalea84 01:27, Feb 21, 2004 (UTC)
Voting ended.
Recommend merging with Zsigmondy number once that article's written, and redirect from here. - Hephaestos| § 03:53, 3 Jul 2004 (UTC)
The word "billion" is ambiguous. Any comments on what to do with the number name in this article?? 66.245.79.55 22:44, 28 Sep 2004 (UTC)
A new article ( 2147483647) was begun on February 2009, and progressively extended. Redirecting to that, pending a move by admins. Radagast3 ( talk) 02:40, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
This page should probably be at 2147483647 (number), which is currently a redirect page. Radagast3 ( talk) 00:10, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
The source cited for this number being the most common phone number on the web is not a reliable source for a fact of this nature as it is an unverified claim. Should adjust the sentence so it doesn't make that claim. CrocodilesAreForWimps ( talk) 03:43, 29 March 2012 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: Moved to 2147483647 (number) per informal guidelines at WP:WikiProject Numbers and WP:AT Consistency criteria Mike Cline ( talk) 13:10, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
2147483647 →
2147483647 (number) – This article is NOT about a year millions of years in the future, is it??
Georgia guy (
talk) 15:51, 3 October 2015 (UTC)
Citation 4 claims that 2,147,483,647 was the largest known prime until 1867. However, the article Largest known prime number claims that 67,280,421,310,721 was discovered as a prime number in 1855. 76.179.99.155 ( talk) 08:13, 6 January 2017 (UTC)
The largest hexadecimal should be FFFFFFFF not 7FFFFFFF 49.184.62.181 ( talk) 12:21, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
The redirect
(214) 748-3647 has been listed at
redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the
redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 February 27 § (214) 748-3647 until a consensus is reached. --
Tamzin
cetacean needed (she|they|xe) 20:11, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
![]() | This article is written in British English with Oxford spelling (colour, realize, organization, analyse; note that -ize is used instead of -ise) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
|
"Google later admitted that this was a joke."
That links to an unconfirmed CNET report. Google's communications team confirmed for me yesterday that it was actually true! YouTube had to upgrade to 64-bit to handle the view count of "Gangnam Style." I wrote about it on Quartz here:
https://qz.com/1005230/chess-coms-ios-app-inadvertently-broke-the-mathematical-limits-of-older-apple-devices/ this is fake info — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:1C1:8B01:AE40:456B:5B09:88C3:BE3B ( talk) 16:59, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
The iOS app for Chess.com hit the 32-bit limit of 2,147,483,647 on June 10, 2017. For 32-bit iPhones and iPads made before mid-2013, the app stopped working. There are more details in the Quartz article I linked to above:
2147483647 can also be a phone number. 214-748 (3647) LoganDark 10:20, Sept 4, 2014 (ULT User's Local Time) — Preceding undated comment added 17:19, 4 September 2014 (UTC)
Is this page really necessary? Jgalea84 01:27, Feb 21, 2004 (UTC)
Voting ended.
Recommend merging with Zsigmondy number once that article's written, and redirect from here. - Hephaestos| § 03:53, 3 Jul 2004 (UTC)
The word "billion" is ambiguous. Any comments on what to do with the number name in this article?? 66.245.79.55 22:44, 28 Sep 2004 (UTC)
A new article ( 2147483647) was begun on February 2009, and progressively extended. Redirecting to that, pending a move by admins. Radagast3 ( talk) 02:40, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
This page should probably be at 2147483647 (number), which is currently a redirect page. Radagast3 ( talk) 00:10, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
The source cited for this number being the most common phone number on the web is not a reliable source for a fact of this nature as it is an unverified claim. Should adjust the sentence so it doesn't make that claim. CrocodilesAreForWimps ( talk) 03:43, 29 March 2012 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: Moved to 2147483647 (number) per informal guidelines at WP:WikiProject Numbers and WP:AT Consistency criteria Mike Cline ( talk) 13:10, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
2147483647 →
2147483647 (number) – This article is NOT about a year millions of years in the future, is it??
Georgia guy (
talk) 15:51, 3 October 2015 (UTC)
Citation 4 claims that 2,147,483,647 was the largest known prime until 1867. However, the article Largest known prime number claims that 67,280,421,310,721 was discovered as a prime number in 1855. 76.179.99.155 ( talk) 08:13, 6 January 2017 (UTC)
The largest hexadecimal should be FFFFFFFF not 7FFFFFFF 49.184.62.181 ( talk) 12:21, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
The redirect
(214) 748-3647 has been listed at
redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the
redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 February 27 § (214) 748-3647 until a consensus is reached. --
Tamzin
cetacean needed (she|they|xe) 20:11, 27 February 2023 (UTC)