![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
"17th June 1999 Australia v South Africa, Birmingham, tied (Australia go through due to victory in game 39)* "
I think you'll find Australia progressed because they finished higher on the Super Six table.
No. There was a three-way tie at the top of the S6 table. Pak, Aus, SA all on 3 wins. Pak d Aus, Aus d SA and SA d Pak; so head-to-head was redundant. The top three were split on net run rate.
No 'Man of the Series' was awarded in 1975, 1979, 1983 and 1987. The first was awarded in 1993. The award was changed to 'Player of the Tournament' in 1999 and then to 'Player of the Series' in 2003 - Ctbolt 03:29, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
I think in World Cup-1999, "man of the series" award was given to Shane Warne while "player of the tournament" to Lance Kluesner. 1999 in fact was the only year in which two such titles were awarded simultaneously. Discussions invited.
since there are still some people who consider that semi final to be the best of all time. I would suggest that its own seperate page is made for that match. The 438 game has its own page. Scubasteve55 ( talk) 20:23, 1 November 2009 (UTC)
Change it, they are listed as full member when they were associates till 2000 and same for kenya in the 2003 page, they were full odi( neither full associate nor full test but an in between stage which was offered by ICC at the time) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.97.248.27 ( talk) 07:49, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
The Super Six table seems to be accurate, in that it reflects the source accurately (see here). However, the source doesn't seem to accurately reflect the facts, since it says each team played five matches in the Super Six stage when they actually only played three. I assume this is to add the correct number of points to the "Points Carried Forward" column, but it doesn't make sense to say each team played five matches when they only played three. – Pee Jay 10:39, 30 May 2019 (UTC)
Australia | Opponent | Totals | RPO | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
v NZL | v PAK | v IND | v ZIM | v RSA | |||
Runs | 213 | 265 | 282 | 303 | 272 | 1335 | 5.35 |
Overs | 50.00 | 50.00 | 50.00 | 50.00 | 49.67 | 249.67 | |
Runs against | 214 | 275 | 205* | 259 | 271 | 1224 | 4.99 |
Overs against | 45.33 | 50.00 | 50.00 | 50.00 | 50.00 | 245.33 | |
Net run rate | 0.36 |
Australia | Opponent | Totals | RPO | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
v IND | v ZIM | v RSA | |||
Runs | 282 | 303 | 272 | 857 | 5.73 |
Overs | 50.00 | 50.00 | 49.67 | 149.67 | |
Runs against | 205* | 259 | 271 | 735 | 4.90 |
Overs against | 50.00 | 50.00 | 50.00 | 150.00 | |
Net run rate | 0.83 |
There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Cricket World Cup which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. — RMCD bot 22:19, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
"17th June 1999 Australia v South Africa, Birmingham, tied (Australia go through due to victory in game 39)* "
I think you'll find Australia progressed because they finished higher on the Super Six table.
No. There was a three-way tie at the top of the S6 table. Pak, Aus, SA all on 3 wins. Pak d Aus, Aus d SA and SA d Pak; so head-to-head was redundant. The top three were split on net run rate.
No 'Man of the Series' was awarded in 1975, 1979, 1983 and 1987. The first was awarded in 1993. The award was changed to 'Player of the Tournament' in 1999 and then to 'Player of the Series' in 2003 - Ctbolt 03:29, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
I think in World Cup-1999, "man of the series" award was given to Shane Warne while "player of the tournament" to Lance Kluesner. 1999 in fact was the only year in which two such titles were awarded simultaneously. Discussions invited.
since there are still some people who consider that semi final to be the best of all time. I would suggest that its own seperate page is made for that match. The 438 game has its own page. Scubasteve55 ( talk) 20:23, 1 November 2009 (UTC)
Change it, they are listed as full member when they were associates till 2000 and same for kenya in the 2003 page, they were full odi( neither full associate nor full test but an in between stage which was offered by ICC at the time) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.97.248.27 ( talk) 07:49, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
The Super Six table seems to be accurate, in that it reflects the source accurately (see here). However, the source doesn't seem to accurately reflect the facts, since it says each team played five matches in the Super Six stage when they actually only played three. I assume this is to add the correct number of points to the "Points Carried Forward" column, but it doesn't make sense to say each team played five matches when they only played three. – Pee Jay 10:39, 30 May 2019 (UTC)
Australia | Opponent | Totals | RPO | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
v NZL | v PAK | v IND | v ZIM | v RSA | |||
Runs | 213 | 265 | 282 | 303 | 272 | 1335 | 5.35 |
Overs | 50.00 | 50.00 | 50.00 | 50.00 | 49.67 | 249.67 | |
Runs against | 214 | 275 | 205* | 259 | 271 | 1224 | 4.99 |
Overs against | 45.33 | 50.00 | 50.00 | 50.00 | 50.00 | 245.33 | |
Net run rate | 0.36 |
Australia | Opponent | Totals | RPO | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
v IND | v ZIM | v RSA | |||
Runs | 282 | 303 | 272 | 857 | 5.73 |
Overs | 50.00 | 50.00 | 49.67 | 149.67 | |
Runs against | 205* | 259 | 271 | 735 | 4.90 |
Overs against | 50.00 | 50.00 | 50.00 | 150.00 | |
Net run rate | 0.83 |
There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Cricket World Cup which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. — RMCD bot 22:19, 16 February 2021 (UTC)