![]() | 1999 Baltimore mayoral election has been listed as one of the
Social sciences and society good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: October 31, 2013. ( Reviewed version). |
![]() | A fact from 1999 Baltimore mayoral election appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 28 November 2013 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
| ![]() |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The common narrative around this election is that O'Malley only won because the black vote was split between Stokes and Bell. But look at the numbers: O'Malley got more than Stokes and Bell combined. Even if some single hypothetical black candidate had emerged and gotten the combined vote totals that Stokes and Bell got, O'Malley still would have won. -- Jfruh ( talk) 22:19, 13 January 2010 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Hurricanehink ( talk · contribs) 16:06, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
The article is decent, but could use a bit of work. On hold for now. --♫ Hurricanehink ( talk) 16:06, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Baltimore mayoral election, 1999. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 21:55, 24 October 2016 (UTC)
![]() | 1999 Baltimore mayoral election has been listed as one of the
Social sciences and society good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: October 31, 2013. ( Reviewed version). |
![]() | A fact from 1999 Baltimore mayoral election appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 28 November 2013 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
| ![]() |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The common narrative around this election is that O'Malley only won because the black vote was split between Stokes and Bell. But look at the numbers: O'Malley got more than Stokes and Bell combined. Even if some single hypothetical black candidate had emerged and gotten the combined vote totals that Stokes and Bell got, O'Malley still would have won. -- Jfruh ( talk) 22:19, 13 January 2010 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Hurricanehink ( talk · contribs) 16:06, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
The article is decent, but could use a bit of work. On hold for now. --♫ Hurricanehink ( talk) 16:06, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Baltimore mayoral election, 1999. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 21:55, 24 October 2016 (UTC)