This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
1997 Australian Grand Prix article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article is a Formula One race report. For editing guidelines on style and structure, please take a look at the
Example race report. Report
Results
Please edit this to-do list to add new suggestions or strike out completed tasks. Last update: August 2007 |
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
1997 Australian Grand Prix. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 17:28, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
@ Bretonbanquet: the lead is supposed to be "a summary of the article's most important contents." Shinji Nakano didn't achieve any real success in Formula One and MasterCard Lola only competed in one race. Can you therefore please explain why you think their debuts are among the article's most important content? SSSB ( talk) 19:27, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
Now, I wasn't watching F1 in 1997 (I wasn't even born), so if them being outclassed was a major talking then maybe it should be in the lead. But it looks like we may have to agree to disagree about the criteria of what does/doesn't belong in the lead (I'm not sure I care enough to go backwards and forwards for an extended period of time). SSSB ( talk) 16:09, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
1997 Australian Grand Prix article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article is a Formula One race report. For editing guidelines on style and structure, please take a look at the
Example race report. Report
Results
Please edit this to-do list to add new suggestions or strike out completed tasks. Last update: August 2007 |
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
1997 Australian Grand Prix. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 17:28, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
@ Bretonbanquet: the lead is supposed to be "a summary of the article's most important contents." Shinji Nakano didn't achieve any real success in Formula One and MasterCard Lola only competed in one race. Can you therefore please explain why you think their debuts are among the article's most important content? SSSB ( talk) 19:27, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
Now, I wasn't watching F1 in 1997 (I wasn't even born), so if them being outclassed was a major talking then maybe it should be in the lead. But it looks like we may have to agree to disagree about the criteria of what does/doesn't belong in the lead (I'm not sure I care enough to go backwards and forwards for an extended period of time). SSSB ( talk) 16:09, 7 July 2022 (UTC)