This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
1996 Lake Huron cyclone article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This is really interesteing, but not being a weatherman or climatologist makes it hard to understand what the heck this article is talking about and get a picture idea of what happened. This "Great Lakes hurricane" was an extremely interesting storm event even for the us laypeople, too. Is there any way that the article can separate the technical stuff and add a layperson's section of what the heck happened (like the path, any damage, wave heights, you know the usual exciting stuff that sells the weather report after a storm). There surely has to be non-technical descriptions of what happened. Thanks!!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 4.224.0.250 ( talk) 04:06, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
Is this article really needed? – Ch acor 08:28, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
I think it's important enough to stay. I'll just give it some cleanup over the week. íslenskur fel lib ylur #12 (samtal) 13:35, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
It would be really helpful if the two units of windspeed were not both metric (m/s; km/h). I mean, after all, the lakes are in the US as well. Can anyone do the conversion? Unschool ( talk) 04:12, 26 August 2008 (UTC)
This article needs to be edited. It needs to emphasize the warm-core (or tropical-like) versus cold-core aspects of the storm system at different points in time. There are a few instances where the word "level" is used where the word "low" needs to be used. The mention of positive vorticity and thermal advection is too technical. The NWS-Detroit web site provides a pretty good alternative to reading this article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 164.47.80.222 ( talk) 19:31, 7 September 2010 (UTC)
Does anyone have a reference for how much damage in dollars was caused by the flooding? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bowser423 ( talk • contribs) 00:46, 24 July 2011 (UTC)
I'd consider myself an expert in cyclones, and my brain is exercised to read this. needs some "dumbing down" or at least a weathergeek-to-english translation. --Bowser the Storm Tracker Chat Me Up 05:19, 24 July 2011 (UTC)
Weather data shows it had 3 throughs connected to it, if they hadn't been connected then it would be a subtropical storm, but yet it still had the throughs connected to it? -- RossoSPC ( talk) 01:27, 20 June 2023 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
1996 Lake Huron cyclone article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This is really interesteing, but not being a weatherman or climatologist makes it hard to understand what the heck this article is talking about and get a picture idea of what happened. This "Great Lakes hurricane" was an extremely interesting storm event even for the us laypeople, too. Is there any way that the article can separate the technical stuff and add a layperson's section of what the heck happened (like the path, any damage, wave heights, you know the usual exciting stuff that sells the weather report after a storm). There surely has to be non-technical descriptions of what happened. Thanks!!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 4.224.0.250 ( talk) 04:06, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
Is this article really needed? – Ch acor 08:28, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
I think it's important enough to stay. I'll just give it some cleanup over the week. íslenskur fel lib ylur #12 (samtal) 13:35, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
It would be really helpful if the two units of windspeed were not both metric (m/s; km/h). I mean, after all, the lakes are in the US as well. Can anyone do the conversion? Unschool ( talk) 04:12, 26 August 2008 (UTC)
This article needs to be edited. It needs to emphasize the warm-core (or tropical-like) versus cold-core aspects of the storm system at different points in time. There are a few instances where the word "level" is used where the word "low" needs to be used. The mention of positive vorticity and thermal advection is too technical. The NWS-Detroit web site provides a pretty good alternative to reading this article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 164.47.80.222 ( talk) 19:31, 7 September 2010 (UTC)
Does anyone have a reference for how much damage in dollars was caused by the flooding? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bowser423 ( talk • contribs) 00:46, 24 July 2011 (UTC)
I'd consider myself an expert in cyclones, and my brain is exercised to read this. needs some "dumbing down" or at least a weathergeek-to-english translation. --Bowser the Storm Tracker Chat Me Up 05:19, 24 July 2011 (UTC)
Weather data shows it had 3 throughs connected to it, if they hadn't been connected then it would be a subtropical storm, but yet it still had the throughs connected to it? -- RossoSPC ( talk) 01:27, 20 June 2023 (UTC)