This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
1995 Quebec referendum article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives:
1,
2Auto-archiving period: 50 days
![]() |
![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | 1995 Quebec referendum was one of the Social sciences and society good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
I really wanted to see this on the site, so I've put up the raw data. I'll look into improving things later on but I thought it was important to get this much up now. I'm looking for any help I can get on arguments for/against, general attitudes, and build-up. -- Matty j 22:28, Jan 8, 2004 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
I am concerned that this article no longer meets the GA criteria, due to large sections of the article that are not cited. The aftermath section contains an "additional citations needed" banner since 2017, which needs to be resolved. Z1720 ( talk) 23:12, 21 October 2022 (UTC)
It is true that the slogan of the "No" campaign signs translates to "we are right to say 'No'", but that is not the official translation that the "No" campaign used. I tried to put in the official translation, but it was reverted. Did the reverter do this simply because it was unsourced? -- Denelson 83 22:46, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
1995 Quebec referendum article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives:
1,
2Auto-archiving period: 50 days
![]() |
![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | 1995 Quebec referendum was one of the Social sciences and society good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
I really wanted to see this on the site, so I've put up the raw data. I'll look into improving things later on but I thought it was important to get this much up now. I'm looking for any help I can get on arguments for/against, general attitudes, and build-up. -- Matty j 22:28, Jan 8, 2004 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
I am concerned that this article no longer meets the GA criteria, due to large sections of the article that are not cited. The aftermath section contains an "additional citations needed" banner since 2017, which needs to be resolved. Z1720 ( talk) 23:12, 21 October 2022 (UTC)
It is true that the slogan of the "No" campaign signs translates to "we are right to say 'No'", but that is not the official translation that the "No" campaign used. I tried to put in the official translation, but it was reverted. Did the reverter do this simply because it was unsourced? -- Denelson 83 22:46, 2 May 2024 (UTC)