Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer: Arsenikk (talk) 10:45, 2 April 2010 (UTC)
I must say I wasn't expecting to ever see national conventions of Norwegian parties at GAN, but it is always nice to be positively surprised. I did a copyedit, but it wasn't as bad as Geschichte may have feared.
- Comments
- "On 7 February, Hagen confirmed his leadership candidacy for the electoral committee." isn't referenced.
- I've changed "central committee" to "central board", as it translate from styre and actually models that of any other board, given that it has authority.
- Days of the week are not included unless essential to the understanding.
- I think arbeidsutvalg should translate executive board, but I'm not 100% sure. I think it is more understanable than "working committee".
- Some of the refs lack accessdate (particularly the Stortinget bios).
Placing on hold. Arsenikk (talk) 10:45, 2 April 2010 (UTC)
- I added one reference and four accessdates. I don't use it on non-websites, because those aren't "retrieved" in the same sense.
Geschichte (
talk)
14:44, 2 April 2010 (UTC)
- There is of course not supposed to be accessdates on offline sources; sorry if that wasn't clear. Arsenikk (talk) 15:32, 2 April 2010 (UTC)
- I added one reference and four accessdates. I don't use it on non-websites, because those aren't "retrieved" in the same sense.
Geschichte (
talk)
14:44, 2 April 2010 (UTC)
- Quick comment
- We aren't meant to use curly quotes.
Aaroncrick
TALK
10:53, 2 April 2010 (UTC)
- What's that?
Geschichte (
talk)
14:37, 2 April 2010 (UTC)
- If you look carefully, there is a difference between “ ” and " ". Only the latter are supposed to be used, according to the MOS (those being the ones actually available on a normal keyboard). But nothing one can really say anything about at a GA review.
Arsenikk
(talk)
15:32, 2 April 2010 (UTC)
- I guess some are present because I started writing the text in Word. Geschichte ( talk) 15:38, 2 April 2010 (UTC)
- If you look carefully, there is a difference between “ ” and " ". Only the latter are supposed to be used, according to the MOS (those being the ones actually available on a normal keyboard). But nothing one can really say anything about at a GA review.
Arsenikk
(talk)
15:32, 2 April 2010 (UTC)
- What's that?
Geschichte (
talk)
14:37, 2 April 2010 (UTC)
Congratulations with a good article. Arsenikk (talk) 15:32, 2 April 2010 (UTC) Thanks! Geschichte ( talk) 15:38, 2 April 2010 (UTC)
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer: Arsenikk (talk) 10:45, 2 April 2010 (UTC)
I must say I wasn't expecting to ever see national conventions of Norwegian parties at GAN, but it is always nice to be positively surprised. I did a copyedit, but it wasn't as bad as Geschichte may have feared.
- Comments
- "On 7 February, Hagen confirmed his leadership candidacy for the electoral committee." isn't referenced.
- I've changed "central committee" to "central board", as it translate from styre and actually models that of any other board, given that it has authority.
- Days of the week are not included unless essential to the understanding.
- I think arbeidsutvalg should translate executive board, but I'm not 100% sure. I think it is more understanable than "working committee".
- Some of the refs lack accessdate (particularly the Stortinget bios).
Placing on hold. Arsenikk (talk) 10:45, 2 April 2010 (UTC)
- I added one reference and four accessdates. I don't use it on non-websites, because those aren't "retrieved" in the same sense.
Geschichte (
talk)
14:44, 2 April 2010 (UTC)
- There is of course not supposed to be accessdates on offline sources; sorry if that wasn't clear. Arsenikk (talk) 15:32, 2 April 2010 (UTC)
- I added one reference and four accessdates. I don't use it on non-websites, because those aren't "retrieved" in the same sense.
Geschichte (
talk)
14:44, 2 April 2010 (UTC)
- Quick comment
- We aren't meant to use curly quotes.
Aaroncrick
TALK
10:53, 2 April 2010 (UTC)
- What's that?
Geschichte (
talk)
14:37, 2 April 2010 (UTC)
- If you look carefully, there is a difference between “ ” and " ". Only the latter are supposed to be used, according to the MOS (those being the ones actually available on a normal keyboard). But nothing one can really say anything about at a GA review.
Arsenikk
(talk)
15:32, 2 April 2010 (UTC)
- I guess some are present because I started writing the text in Word. Geschichte ( talk) 15:38, 2 April 2010 (UTC)
- If you look carefully, there is a difference between “ ” and " ". Only the latter are supposed to be used, according to the MOS (those being the ones actually available on a normal keyboard). But nothing one can really say anything about at a GA review.
Arsenikk
(talk)
15:32, 2 April 2010 (UTC)
- What's that?
Geschichte (
talk)
14:37, 2 April 2010 (UTC)
Congratulations with a good article. Arsenikk (talk) 15:32, 2 April 2010 (UTC) Thanks! Geschichte ( talk) 15:38, 2 April 2010 (UTC)