![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | 1990 Pacific hurricane season has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||
Current status: Good article |
I can't get Polo's image. juan andrés 19:09, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
Thank you. I have finally added Polo's paragraph. If I got something mistaken, or if it missed something, feel free to edit my changes! juan andrés 04:59, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
Sorry, I was the annon user that starts with 201.143... Remember, if you think that Polo's paragraph needs something, feel free to edit it! juan andrés 05:01, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
Now Aka was added. I think the only remaining are the depressions. juan andrés 05:40, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
It's at least start class now. Sources are needed for the remaining sections, and depressions are needed as well. Hurricanehink ( talk) 19:28, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
Expand the Season Summary and add the depressions, 4 Eastern Pacific and 1 Central Pacific. Add sources to these remaining sections juan andrés 20:25, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
Depressions added. Only need to expand season summary. juan andrés 01:14, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
Season summary expanded. If its there something missing you can put it here at TODO. juan andrés 02:18, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
checked and corrected spelling and grammar errors. Now what does this article need to bump it up to GA-class at least?
juan andrés
03:11, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
copy-edit from Marie to Vance.
201.143.222.207
06:31, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
copyedit finished. I think this article is ready for GA-class. juan andrés 22:10, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
Final revisions made to the article. juan andrés 22:18, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
Another problem, there are next to no metric conversions. For these reasons, I failed the GA nomination. Once these issues are addressed, it could pass, as it has a good base right now. Hurricanehink ( talk) 20:18, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
Reviewer: Hurricanehink ( talk) 15:27, 3 May 2010 (UTC)
Fausto, Genevieve, Norbert, and Simon still have ref issues, I'm not sure about the convert template, but that still needs to be fixed (the rounding and the abbreviated units). Also, I notice theire are some instances of nautical miles, which the project agreed to phase out and replace with regular miles. I checked Google news, and there are news stories on Rachel, Marie, and Trudy. For such a notable season, the lede should be longer. Also, not sure if it's worth noting, but Hurricane Diana was technically a tropical depression in the basin, and it could probably use a mention. I'm sorry, I just feel like there's a lot of work to be done still. There's too much track description in the article and too little meteorological details (what allowed storms to strengthen and weaken, what caused their tracks). As a result, I am failing the nomination. Hurricanehink ( talk) 16:39, 8 May 2010 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
I can't be the reviewer, but I can make comments. Many of your edits used exact figures for mi, km, or km/hr, which isn't going to fly within the project. Everything should be rounded to the nearest 5, per project standards. This was one of the reasons why GAN wasn't attempted sooner by myself. Granted, the wording needed to be improved, but that was a simple matter compared to the units and rounding. I had mistakenly used nm (which NHC uses mind you), when statute miles (to the nearest 5) should have been used. I'd fix this before someone reviews the article, or it's going to fail all the same. Thegreatdr ( talk) 03:10, 4 January 2011 (UTC)
Reviewer: Y E Tropical Cyclone 23:01, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
However, I will be reviewing the article.
Nice article, but I have some comments.
Good article. Y E Tropical Cyclone
During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!
-- JeffGBot ( talk) 23:57, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
I don't know who overlooked this and passed the GA, but the season is missing a storm. - HurricaneSpin (Talk) 20:21, 5 July 2013 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect
Tropical Strom Rachel (1990). The discussion will occur at
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 June 9#Tropical Strom Rachel (1990) until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.
CycloneYoris
talk!
01:36, 9 June 2020 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | 1990 Pacific hurricane season has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||
Current status: Good article |
I can't get Polo's image. juan andrés 19:09, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
Thank you. I have finally added Polo's paragraph. If I got something mistaken, or if it missed something, feel free to edit my changes! juan andrés 04:59, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
Sorry, I was the annon user that starts with 201.143... Remember, if you think that Polo's paragraph needs something, feel free to edit it! juan andrés 05:01, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
Now Aka was added. I think the only remaining are the depressions. juan andrés 05:40, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
It's at least start class now. Sources are needed for the remaining sections, and depressions are needed as well. Hurricanehink ( talk) 19:28, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
Expand the Season Summary and add the depressions, 4 Eastern Pacific and 1 Central Pacific. Add sources to these remaining sections juan andrés 20:25, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
Depressions added. Only need to expand season summary. juan andrés 01:14, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
Season summary expanded. If its there something missing you can put it here at TODO. juan andrés 02:18, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
checked and corrected spelling and grammar errors. Now what does this article need to bump it up to GA-class at least?
juan andrés
03:11, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
copy-edit from Marie to Vance.
201.143.222.207
06:31, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
copyedit finished. I think this article is ready for GA-class. juan andrés 22:10, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
Final revisions made to the article. juan andrés 22:18, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
Another problem, there are next to no metric conversions. For these reasons, I failed the GA nomination. Once these issues are addressed, it could pass, as it has a good base right now. Hurricanehink ( talk) 20:18, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
Reviewer: Hurricanehink ( talk) 15:27, 3 May 2010 (UTC)
Fausto, Genevieve, Norbert, and Simon still have ref issues, I'm not sure about the convert template, but that still needs to be fixed (the rounding and the abbreviated units). Also, I notice theire are some instances of nautical miles, which the project agreed to phase out and replace with regular miles. I checked Google news, and there are news stories on Rachel, Marie, and Trudy. For such a notable season, the lede should be longer. Also, not sure if it's worth noting, but Hurricane Diana was technically a tropical depression in the basin, and it could probably use a mention. I'm sorry, I just feel like there's a lot of work to be done still. There's too much track description in the article and too little meteorological details (what allowed storms to strengthen and weaken, what caused their tracks). As a result, I am failing the nomination. Hurricanehink ( talk) 16:39, 8 May 2010 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
I can't be the reviewer, but I can make comments. Many of your edits used exact figures for mi, km, or km/hr, which isn't going to fly within the project. Everything should be rounded to the nearest 5, per project standards. This was one of the reasons why GAN wasn't attempted sooner by myself. Granted, the wording needed to be improved, but that was a simple matter compared to the units and rounding. I had mistakenly used nm (which NHC uses mind you), when statute miles (to the nearest 5) should have been used. I'd fix this before someone reviews the article, or it's going to fail all the same. Thegreatdr ( talk) 03:10, 4 January 2011 (UTC)
Reviewer: Y E Tropical Cyclone 23:01, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
However, I will be reviewing the article.
Nice article, but I have some comments.
Good article. Y E Tropical Cyclone
During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!
-- JeffGBot ( talk) 23:57, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
I don't know who overlooked this and passed the GA, but the season is missing a storm. - HurricaneSpin (Talk) 20:21, 5 July 2013 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect
Tropical Strom Rachel (1990). The discussion will occur at
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 June 9#Tropical Strom Rachel (1990) until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.
CycloneYoris
talk!
01:36, 9 June 2020 (UTC)