This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
1989 Pacific hurricane season article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
1989 Pacific hurricane season has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||||||||||||||
1989 Pacific hurricane season is the main article in the 1989 Pacific hurricane season series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so. | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
A decent article needs images to improve its quality juan andrés 04:16, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
Is it possible we could make a main article for Hurricane Kiko? it caused severe damage in Baja california, and was one of only 2 major hurricanes to strike the Eastern side of the peninsula. I think it should deserve a main article. Does anyone agree about this? 76.236.187.191 ( talk) 21:21, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
Wait, I didn't mean a MAIN article; I just meant something like Hurricane Kiko (1989), not just Hurricane Kiko. It was signifigant. Some reasons of why I think it was signifigant include the following:
Hurricane | Season | Wind speed | Ref. |
---|---|---|---|
Otis | 2023 | 160 mph (260 km/h) | [1] |
Patricia | 2015 | 150 mph (240 km/h) | [2] |
Madeline | 1976 | 145 mph (230 km/h) | [3] |
Iniki | 1992 | [4] | |
Twelve | 1957 | 140 mph (220 km/h) | [5] |
"Mexico" | 1959 | [5] | |
Kenna | 2002 | [6] | |
Lidia | 2023 | [7] |
These are reasons of why I think it should have a main article named Hurricane Kiko (1989). Also, it was strange because it developed out of a Mesoscale Convective System, an area of thunderstorms that forms due to the Orographic Effect. They rarely develop into hurricanes, but with Kiko, it became a category 3 out of this type of system. Do you agree now? Well? Can Kiko have an article? 76.236.187.191 ( talk) 21:21, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
You didn't answer my question; can Kiko have an article saying Hurricane Kiko (1989)? I put some facts it set above which support it. So can it have an article? I know the name wasn't retired after this year but I don't want the article to be just Hurricane Kiko. I want it to be Hurricane Kiko (1989). Do you agree with this? 76.236.187.191 ( talk) 22:23, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
It looks as though this article has waited a very long time for a review. I will do so for you. So far it does not qualify for any of the quick fail requirements!
Reviewer: TimonyCrickets ( talk) 01:21, 19 July 2010 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
Overall the this article is looking very good and is close to a GA status. There are a few issues which you should address that I will outline before. I am giving this article a hold status while these issues are addressed.
I am very concerned at the quality of this article and feel that it does not meet the GA standards, i will try and give some feedback here. Jason Rees ( talk) 22:33, 19 July 2010 (UTC)
To start i will deal with my area of expertise - the names.
Thank you very much for the review. I have addressed theses issues with a few exceptions. I feel the 4-E does not need an expansion because it is at similar length to weak tropical storms. Given the fact that there is a sub-article for cosme I did not expand the impact section. Throughout the article, the only reason why i don't put forecasters name in because the NHC did not list there name. Again, thank you. Y E Tropical Cyclone 17:35, 23 July 2010 (UTC)
During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!
-- JeffGBot ( talk) 08:03, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!
-- JeffGBot ( talk) 08:03, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!
-- JeffGBot ( talk) 08:04, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!
-- JeffGBot ( talk) 08:04, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!
-- JeffGBot ( talk) 08:04, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
Why was the season effects table moved back? I'd like to point out to you here that I mentioned the season effects table on how it should be in the season summary section along with ACE. I'm sorry, but I don't see any reason not to have it in the season summary section. The effects table summaries the main events in the season, and the season effects section has no other real content in it. Any thoughts on this? Y E Pacific Hurricane 21:51, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
I strongly believe that this section is required, as Tropical Depression 23E doesnt have enough to sustain a whole section and nor will some of the other tropical depressions when i have finished cleaning this article up. Jason Rees ( talk) 22:29, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
I think there should be an "other storms" section for all tropical depressions that did not affect land or cross into CPAC. --♫ Hurricanehink ( talk) 22:54, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
My opinion is that for this season, and past seasons where TCRs were not issued for tropical depressions, a 3rd class header for "Other Storms" under the Storms level 2 header is the most appropriate option, since tropical depressions are storms and shouldn't be separated with a level 2 header. -- TheAustinMan( Talk| Works) 16:12, 10 June 2012 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on 1989 Pacific hurricane season. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 02:14, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on 1989 Pacific hurricane season. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 03:36, 16 June 2017 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Fails WP:NWX due to the minimal impact. Most of what's mentioned here could be easily summarized within the season section which seems to be quite lacking as of this point. Noah, AA Talk 14:37, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
1989 Pacific hurricane season article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
1989 Pacific hurricane season has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||||||||||||||
1989 Pacific hurricane season is the main article in the 1989 Pacific hurricane season series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so. | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
A decent article needs images to improve its quality juan andrés 04:16, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
Is it possible we could make a main article for Hurricane Kiko? it caused severe damage in Baja california, and was one of only 2 major hurricanes to strike the Eastern side of the peninsula. I think it should deserve a main article. Does anyone agree about this? 76.236.187.191 ( talk) 21:21, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
Wait, I didn't mean a MAIN article; I just meant something like Hurricane Kiko (1989), not just Hurricane Kiko. It was signifigant. Some reasons of why I think it was signifigant include the following:
Hurricane | Season | Wind speed | Ref. |
---|---|---|---|
Otis | 2023 | 160 mph (260 km/h) | [1] |
Patricia | 2015 | 150 mph (240 km/h) | [2] |
Madeline | 1976 | 145 mph (230 km/h) | [3] |
Iniki | 1992 | [4] | |
Twelve | 1957 | 140 mph (220 km/h) | [5] |
"Mexico" | 1959 | [5] | |
Kenna | 2002 | [6] | |
Lidia | 2023 | [7] |
These are reasons of why I think it should have a main article named Hurricane Kiko (1989). Also, it was strange because it developed out of a Mesoscale Convective System, an area of thunderstorms that forms due to the Orographic Effect. They rarely develop into hurricanes, but with Kiko, it became a category 3 out of this type of system. Do you agree now? Well? Can Kiko have an article? 76.236.187.191 ( talk) 21:21, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
You didn't answer my question; can Kiko have an article saying Hurricane Kiko (1989)? I put some facts it set above which support it. So can it have an article? I know the name wasn't retired after this year but I don't want the article to be just Hurricane Kiko. I want it to be Hurricane Kiko (1989). Do you agree with this? 76.236.187.191 ( talk) 22:23, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
It looks as though this article has waited a very long time for a review. I will do so for you. So far it does not qualify for any of the quick fail requirements!
Reviewer: TimonyCrickets ( talk) 01:21, 19 July 2010 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
Overall the this article is looking very good and is close to a GA status. There are a few issues which you should address that I will outline before. I am giving this article a hold status while these issues are addressed.
I am very concerned at the quality of this article and feel that it does not meet the GA standards, i will try and give some feedback here. Jason Rees ( talk) 22:33, 19 July 2010 (UTC)
To start i will deal with my area of expertise - the names.
Thank you very much for the review. I have addressed theses issues with a few exceptions. I feel the 4-E does not need an expansion because it is at similar length to weak tropical storms. Given the fact that there is a sub-article for cosme I did not expand the impact section. Throughout the article, the only reason why i don't put forecasters name in because the NHC did not list there name. Again, thank you. Y E Tropical Cyclone 17:35, 23 July 2010 (UTC)
During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!
-- JeffGBot ( talk) 08:03, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!
-- JeffGBot ( talk) 08:03, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!
-- JeffGBot ( talk) 08:04, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!
-- JeffGBot ( talk) 08:04, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!
-- JeffGBot ( talk) 08:04, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
Why was the season effects table moved back? I'd like to point out to you here that I mentioned the season effects table on how it should be in the season summary section along with ACE. I'm sorry, but I don't see any reason not to have it in the season summary section. The effects table summaries the main events in the season, and the season effects section has no other real content in it. Any thoughts on this? Y E Pacific Hurricane 21:51, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
I strongly believe that this section is required, as Tropical Depression 23E doesnt have enough to sustain a whole section and nor will some of the other tropical depressions when i have finished cleaning this article up. Jason Rees ( talk) 22:29, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
I think there should be an "other storms" section for all tropical depressions that did not affect land or cross into CPAC. --♫ Hurricanehink ( talk) 22:54, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
My opinion is that for this season, and past seasons where TCRs were not issued for tropical depressions, a 3rd class header for "Other Storms" under the Storms level 2 header is the most appropriate option, since tropical depressions are storms and shouldn't be separated with a level 2 header. -- TheAustinMan( Talk| Works) 16:12, 10 June 2012 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on 1989 Pacific hurricane season. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 02:14, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on 1989 Pacific hurricane season. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 03:36, 16 June 2017 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Fails WP:NWX due to the minimal impact. Most of what's mentioned here could be easily summarized within the season section which seems to be quite lacking as of this point. Noah, AA Talk 14:37, 30 January 2024 (UTC)