Don't remove 30 million, He will revert it :-0

• [1] deletion of 30 million

• [2] re-insertion of 30 million

• [3] re-deletion of 30 million

• [4] 30 million again

• [5] and again

Long live Xenu -- Gerash 77 21:31, 5 March 2007 (UTC) reply

"he"? are you trying to be funny? I seem to have readded it once probably by accident -- Rayis 21:46, 5 March 2007 (UTC) reply

Lets count again, from the edits cited above, 1, 2, 3, 4. "once" naturally, means one time. Just as 30,000 is not 30,000,000. Please see the definition. Thanks.-- Gerash 77 22:27, 5 March 2007 (UTC) reply

Very funny. If it was removed, it was as part of restoring the whole article not just that part, unless by accident. Please do not use videos as sources. These are not reliable academic sources to back up controvertial information in a dispute, unless you want to word it like "it has been claimed that.." -- Rayis 22:32, 5 March 2007 (UTC) reply

Stop arguing about it. The 30 million is obviously absurd & false. I'm not sure where it is from, but I wouldn't be surprised if it was a typo. So just drop it. The Behnam 08:37, 6 March 2007 (UTC) reply

No argument, I believe we have a comedian in the house -- Rayis 09:57, 6 March 2007 (UTC) reply

The 30 million reverts was one of the funniest incidents on Wikipedia, even funnier than Stephen Colbert's vandalism, worthy of recognition in the archives of wiki order. Thanks for a week of laughter Rayis!-- Gerash 77 19:07, 6 March 2007 (UTC) reply

Yeah? well 30,000 or 30 million, I bet the hundreds of girls in prisons who were being raped befor getting hanged were not laughing, so keep your humour to yourself and lets try to improve the article rather than making jokes -- Rayis 21:39, 9 March 2007 (UTC) reply

As an apolitical person who just encountered this article about supposed executions in Iran, I have started to doubt anything you exiled dissidents have told us, including the supposed rapes in Iranian prisoners. If you people like to be believed, you should stop the hyperbole.-- Gerash 77 22:48, 9 March 2007 (UTC) reply

Gerash, this is not a chat room. Read Wikipedia:Talk page "They should not be used by editors as platforms for their personal views". Frankly, I don't care what you think of anyone, or believe in what I or anyone says. No one here is preaching anything you should believe, that's Mullahs job. -- Rayis 23:00, 9 March 2007 (UTC) reply

Technically you started of it, Rayis. Both of you should stop. The Behnam 23:05, 9 March 2007 (UTC) reply

I don't know how you came to that conclusion Behnam, but I would appreciate it if you did not continue this. Thanks -- Rayis 23:08, 9 March 2007 (UTC) reply

"I believe we have a comedian in the house." Very 'chat room'. So don't do it again. The Behnam 23:10, 9 March 2007 (UTC) reply

Yes, but that was a response to a joke. In any case I don't think you make a good mediator as by giving your opinion on who started what. I stated that I don't wanna continue this discussion so I would appreciate you not telling me what to do -- Rayis 23:15, 9 March 2007 (UTC) reply

Also, your comment about the 'girls being raped' was chat-room, so again, use the talk page for its intended purpose, thanks. The Behnam 23:19, 9 March 2007 (UTC) reply

Behnam, this is an article discussion page, feel free to use my talk page if you have something to say to me. -- Rayis 23:22, 9 March 2007 (UTC) reply

It is perfectly reasonable to issue contextual reminders here, just as you did for Gerash77 above. Anyway, do we have anything more to discuss on this matter? The Behnam 23:24, 9 March 2007 (UTC) reply

I don't need "contextual reminders" from a user who was recently blocked for breaking a policy. Yeah, lets leave it -- Rayis 23:27, 9 March 2007 (UTC) reply

For the last time, stop it Rayis. -- Gerash 77 01:15, 10 March 2007 (UTC) reply

And I mean that for all the childish behavior on any talk page. Thank you.-- Gerash 77 01:37, 10 March 2007 (UTC) reply