1987 Viking Sally murder has been listed as one of the
Social sciences and society good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: January 25, 2021. ( Reviewed version). |
A fact from 1987 Viking Sally murder appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 10 February 2021 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Willbb234 ( talk · contribs) 11:58, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
I'll take up this review.
Willbb234
Talk (please {{
ping}} me in replies) 11:58, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
More to come, but I'm a little busy at the moment so later. Willbb234 Talk (please {{ ping}} me in replies) 12:14, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
More to come, Willbb234 Talk (please {{ ping}} me in replies) 13:12, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
The article is of good quality so there wasn't many mistakes to point out. I have a couple of comments:
Other than that, I think the article can get no better, so I'll pass it for GA once the comments are addressed. Kind regards, Willbb234 Talk (please {{ ping}} me in replies) 11:24, 24 January 2021 (UTC)
Rate | Attribute | Review Comment |
---|---|---|
1. Well-written: | ||
1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct. | Any issues have been addressed. | |
1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation. | The MOS has been adhered to. | |
2. Verifiable with no original research: | ||
2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline. | Could do with some more sources, but the sources that there are are well attributed. | |
2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose). | References checked and reliable | |
2c. it contains no original research. | No | |
2d. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism. | Checked with Earwig's detector and no copyvio found | |
3. Broad in its coverage: | ||
3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic. | Yes | |
3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style). | Yes | |
4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each. | Neutral | |
5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute. | no edit wars | |
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio: | ||
6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content. | Checked and fine | |
6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions. | Could do with some more images, but the ones there are are relevant and have suitable captions. | |
7. Overall assessment. | Well done and very well deserved. Happy editing. |
The result was: promoted by
SL93 (
talk) 07:00, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
Improved to Good Article status by DoubleGrazing ( talk). Self-nominated at 08:52, 28 January 2021 (UTC).
I propose to hide or conceal the name of at least the surviving victim. The person is still alive and should not further suffer from being involved in this crime. Especially since the case will go to court later in 2021. There are no public statements, books or anything that suggest the person's intent to be exposed further. See "prolonging the victimization" and "Privacy of names" in Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons. Sommozzatore ( talk) 13:34, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
1987 Viking Sally murder has been listed as one of the
Social sciences and society good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: January 25, 2021. ( Reviewed version). |
A fact from 1987 Viking Sally murder appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 10 February 2021 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Willbb234 ( talk · contribs) 11:58, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
I'll take up this review.
Willbb234
Talk (please {{
ping}} me in replies) 11:58, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
More to come, but I'm a little busy at the moment so later. Willbb234 Talk (please {{ ping}} me in replies) 12:14, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
More to come, Willbb234 Talk (please {{ ping}} me in replies) 13:12, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
The article is of good quality so there wasn't many mistakes to point out. I have a couple of comments:
Other than that, I think the article can get no better, so I'll pass it for GA once the comments are addressed. Kind regards, Willbb234 Talk (please {{ ping}} me in replies) 11:24, 24 January 2021 (UTC)
Rate | Attribute | Review Comment |
---|---|---|
1. Well-written: | ||
1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct. | Any issues have been addressed. | |
1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation. | The MOS has been adhered to. | |
2. Verifiable with no original research: | ||
2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline. | Could do with some more sources, but the sources that there are are well attributed. | |
2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose). | References checked and reliable | |
2c. it contains no original research. | No | |
2d. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism. | Checked with Earwig's detector and no copyvio found | |
3. Broad in its coverage: | ||
3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic. | Yes | |
3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style). | Yes | |
4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each. | Neutral | |
5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute. | no edit wars | |
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio: | ||
6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content. | Checked and fine | |
6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions. | Could do with some more images, but the ones there are are relevant and have suitable captions. | |
7. Overall assessment. | Well done and very well deserved. Happy editing. |
The result was: promoted by
SL93 (
talk) 07:00, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
Improved to Good Article status by DoubleGrazing ( talk). Self-nominated at 08:52, 28 January 2021 (UTC).
I propose to hide or conceal the name of at least the surviving victim. The person is still alive and should not further suffer from being involved in this crime. Especially since the case will go to court later in 2021. There are no public statements, books or anything that suggest the person's intent to be exposed further. See "prolonging the victimization" and "Privacy of names" in Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons. Sommozzatore ( talk) 13:34, 6 February 2021 (UTC)