1982 Florida subtropical storm has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||||||||
1982 Florida subtropical storm is part of the 1982 Atlantic hurricane season series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so. | ||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||
Current status: Good article |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
|
Not bad. Might want to consider moving it to Subtropical Storm One (1982). Good luck! íslenskur fel lib ylur #12 (samtal) 02:02, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
It's almost B class. More Wikilinks and inline sourcing would be good. Also, the Atlantic ocean section should be put in the preps, IMO. It's mostly about how the race was postponed, and what could've happened. Phrases like (see above) should be avoided. Be sure to add sourcing to every last statement. Metric units are needed. Also, I doubt damage totals for those Florida counties are still complete. It's 23 years after the event, and I seriously doubt it would take that long for such a minimal storm. The three Florida impact paragraphs should be trimmed down to two, as there's repetitive info. All in all, not too bad. Hurricanehink ( talk) 00:49, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
Something else: Unnamed storms are never retired. There's no need to say "because of lack of effects, the storm was not retired" or similar. – Ch acor 00:53, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
Looking at it, probably also needs a LOT more sourcing/citing. – Ch acor 00:57, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
:For the first one i mean..ugh... every time i put it up-the link dissapears.
Mitchazenia V3.0 20:13, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
GA pass. Good job! Juliancolton ( talk) 16:12, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
After we get done with Danny, and SSHS on FAC, I think you should put this up for FAC. Juliancolton ( talk) 19:50, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on 1982 Florida subtropical storm. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 20:49, 15 June 2017 (UTC)
1982 Florida subtropical storm has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||||||||
1982 Florida subtropical storm is part of the 1982 Atlantic hurricane season series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so. | ||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||
Current status: Good article |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
|
Not bad. Might want to consider moving it to Subtropical Storm One (1982). Good luck! íslenskur fel lib ylur #12 (samtal) 02:02, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
It's almost B class. More Wikilinks and inline sourcing would be good. Also, the Atlantic ocean section should be put in the preps, IMO. It's mostly about how the race was postponed, and what could've happened. Phrases like (see above) should be avoided. Be sure to add sourcing to every last statement. Metric units are needed. Also, I doubt damage totals for those Florida counties are still complete. It's 23 years after the event, and I seriously doubt it would take that long for such a minimal storm. The three Florida impact paragraphs should be trimmed down to two, as there's repetitive info. All in all, not too bad. Hurricanehink ( talk) 00:49, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
Something else: Unnamed storms are never retired. There's no need to say "because of lack of effects, the storm was not retired" or similar. – Ch acor 00:53, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
Looking at it, probably also needs a LOT more sourcing/citing. – Ch acor 00:57, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
:For the first one i mean..ugh... every time i put it up-the link dissapears.
Mitchazenia V3.0 20:13, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
GA pass. Good job! Juliancolton ( talk) 16:12, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
After we get done with Danny, and SSHS on FAC, I think you should put this up for FAC. Juliancolton ( talk) 19:50, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on 1982 Florida subtropical storm. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 20:49, 15 June 2017 (UTC)