This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Greece, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Greece on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GreeceWikipedia:WikiProject GreeceTemplate:WikiProject GreeceGreek articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject European Union, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the
European Union on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.European UnionWikipedia:WikiProject European UnionTemplate:WikiProject European UnionEuropean Union articles
@
Noolier: I was confused by your edit at first, as the 1986 entry at the {{European Union candidates}} template is a redirect to
Enlargement of the European Union#Mediterranean enlargements. Regardless, neither of them should really be an article as they only exist to duplicate a sentence each from the much more robust linked section. If you do not intend to work on either article to expand them beyond their current state, they should be turned into redirects until someone takes them up. Deadbeef06:25, 4 January 2015 (UTC)reply
I don't disagree, but the articles would probably be most useful as a redirect in their current form. Readers seeking information on the subjects would probably rather be treated to an article (section) with context than one that pulls a single sentence from the section and adds a simple map. Deadbeef07:00, 4 January 2015 (UTC)reply
This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Greece, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Greece on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GreeceWikipedia:WikiProject GreeceTemplate:WikiProject GreeceGreek articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject European Union, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the
European Union on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.European UnionWikipedia:WikiProject European UnionTemplate:WikiProject European UnionEuropean Union articles
@
Noolier: I was confused by your edit at first, as the 1986 entry at the {{European Union candidates}} template is a redirect to
Enlargement of the European Union#Mediterranean enlargements. Regardless, neither of them should really be an article as they only exist to duplicate a sentence each from the much more robust linked section. If you do not intend to work on either article to expand them beyond their current state, they should be turned into redirects until someone takes them up. Deadbeef06:25, 4 January 2015 (UTC)reply
I don't disagree, but the articles would probably be most useful as a redirect in their current form. Readers seeking information on the subjects would probably rather be treated to an article (section) with context than one that pulls a single sentence from the section and adds a simple map. Deadbeef07:00, 4 January 2015 (UTC)reply