This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Politics of the United Kingdom This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Politics of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Politics of the United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomPolitics of the United Kingdom articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. Elections and Referendums This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums articles

The figures from the first ballot are at odds with those reported in the Glasgow Herald at the time - it would indicate Foot has 110 votes and Short was ahead by 1. ^[1] Not sure where the figures here have come from, but the 89 for Foot would seem to be wrong (and thus the percentage figures will be too). I will look to see if I can get a second source to confirm. Dunarc ( talk) 23:53, 23 March 2021 (UTC) reply

I have found that Butler's British Political Facts (2018_gives the 111, 89, 61 vote figures ^[2] cited here, so perhaps the Glasgow Herald was wrong.That said Labour had over 280 MPs at the time, so over 20 cannot have voted if these figures are correct. Dunarc ( talk) 22:44, 5 April 2021 (UTC) reply