GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer: Sven Manguard ( talk · contribs) 23:50, 8 March 2013 (UTC)
GAN Quicksheet 1.24 SM
(
Criteria)
Starting comments: I will be taking on this review. Please give me some time, as I might have to leave before I'm done with the initial review. You will not see any further edits until I have completed the full review, which should be done sometime within the next five hours.
Sven Manguard
Wha?
23:53, 8 March 2013 (UTC)
1. Well written:
2. Accurate and verifiable:
Section acceptable
3. Broad in coverage:
Section acceptable
4. Neutral:
Section acceptable
6. Image use:
Section acceptable
7. Additional items not required for a GA, but requested by the reviewer:
Comments after the initial review: I have nothing but the highest respect for your work, but if you're not copyediting your work before you submit it for review, you really need to. There were several instances here where words were missing (
1,
2, plus the sentence pointed out above). Now I honestly don't really care about copyediting as I review things, but some people just don't like to do that. You barely leave things for me to point out at all (a good thing), but you've got the potential to get so good at this that GANs will largely become a rubber stamp process if you can nail the copyediting issue.
Sven Manguard
Wha?
04:36, 9 March 2013 (UTC)
Comments after second review: Okay, most of those changes are good, but could you please explain why you removed the 'Records' section? Sven Manguard Wha? 04:43, 15 March 2013 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer: Sven Manguard ( talk · contribs) 23:50, 8 March 2013 (UTC)
GAN Quicksheet 1.24 SM
(
Criteria)
Starting comments: I will be taking on this review. Please give me some time, as I might have to leave before I'm done with the initial review. You will not see any further edits until I have completed the full review, which should be done sometime within the next five hours.
Sven Manguard
Wha?
23:53, 8 March 2013 (UTC)
1. Well written:
2. Accurate and verifiable:
Section acceptable
3. Broad in coverage:
Section acceptable
4. Neutral:
Section acceptable
6. Image use:
Section acceptable
7. Additional items not required for a GA, but requested by the reviewer:
Comments after the initial review: I have nothing but the highest respect for your work, but if you're not copyediting your work before you submit it for review, you really need to. There were several instances here where words were missing (
1,
2, plus the sentence pointed out above). Now I honestly don't really care about copyediting as I review things, but some people just don't like to do that. You barely leave things for me to point out at all (a good thing), but you've got the potential to get so good at this that GANs will largely become a rubber stamp process if you can nail the copyediting issue.
Sven Manguard
Wha?
04:36, 9 March 2013 (UTC)
Comments after second review: Okay, most of those changes are good, but could you please explain why you removed the 'Records' section? Sven Manguard Wha? 04:43, 15 March 2013 (UTC)