 | 1920 Xalapa earthquake ( final version) received a peer review by Wikipedia editors, which on 3 April 2023 was archived. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article. |
 | 1920 Xalapa earthquake has been listed as one of the
Natural sciences good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: October 30, 2022. ( Reviewed version). |
| This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
1920 Xalapa earthquake article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
.svg){kind=small} |
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but
graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at
pageviews.wmcloud.org |
 | A fact from 1920 Xalapa earthquake appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 8 November 2022 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
 | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:1920 Xalapa earthquake/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Bdonjc ( talk · contribs) 06:04, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and
verifiable.
- a (
reference section):
b (citations to
reliable sources): c (
OR): d (
copyvio and
plagiarism):
- a (
reference section):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (
major aspects): b (
focused):
- a (
major aspects):
- It follows the
neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by
images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have
non-free use rationales): b (
appropriate use with
suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have
non-free use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Overall, this is a well-written and well-covered article. There were a few spelling and grammatical errors, but I fixed them. Bdonjc talk 04:57, 30 October 2022 (UTC)
- Pass/Fail:
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by
Rlink2 (
talk)
00:36, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
( )
To T:DYK
- ... that the first
scientific study of aftershocks following a destructive earthquake was undertaken after the
1920 Xalapa earthquake? Source:
[1]
- Reviewed:
- Comment: QPQ not required since this is my third DYK nomination. Full text can be found on ResearchGate.
Improved to Good Article status by Dora the Axe-plorer ( talk). Self-nominated at 01:28, 31 October 2022 (UTC).
| General: Article is new enough and long enough |
|---|
| Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
|---|
|
| Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
|---|
|
| QPQ: None required. |
Overall:
@
Dora the Axe-plorer: Good article.
Going to approve in good faith due to foreign language sources.
Onegreatjoke (
talk)
13:10, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
-
The source says "probably the first aftershock study", but the hook assert this as a known fact. I think we need to tweak the wording in the hook. --
RoySmith
(talk)
23:06, 2 November 2022 (UTC)
- ALT blurb 1 ... that the first probable scientific study of aftershocks following a destructive earthquake was undertaken after the 1920 Xalapa earthquake?
Categories:
- Old requests for peer review
- Wikipedia good articles
- Natural sciences good articles
- Wikipedia Did you know articles
- GA-Class WikiProject Earthquakes articles
- High-importance WikiProject Earthquakes articles
- WikiProject Earthquakes articles
- GA-Class Mexico articles
- Mid-importance Mexico articles
- WikiProject Mexico articles
- GA-Class Disaster management articles
- Mid-importance Disaster management articles
|
| 1920 Xalapa earthquake ( final version) received a peer review by Wikipedia editors, which on 3 April 2023 was archived. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article. |
|
| 1920 Xalapa earthquake has been listed as one of the
Natural sciences good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: October 30, 2022. ( Reviewed version). |
| This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
1920 Xalapa earthquake article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
|
|
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but
graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at
pageviews.wmcloud.org |
|
| A fact from 1920 Xalapa earthquake appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 8 November 2022 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
| |
| This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:1920 Xalapa earthquake/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Bdonjc ( talk · contribs) 06:04, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and
verifiable.
- a (
reference section): b (citations to
reliable sources): c (
OR): d (
copyvio and
plagiarism):
- a (
reference section):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (
major aspects): b (
focused):
- a (
major aspects):
- It follows the
neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by
images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have
non-free use rationales): b (
appropriate use with
suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have
non-free use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Overall, this is a well-written and well-covered article. There were a few spelling and grammatical errors, but I fixed them. Bdonjc talk 04:57, 30 October 2022 (UTC)
- Pass/Fail:
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by
Rlink2 (
talk)
00:36, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
( )
To T:DYK
- ... that the first
scientific study of aftershocks following a destructive earthquake was undertaken after the
1920 Xalapa earthquake? Source:
[1]
- Reviewed:
- Comment: QPQ not required since this is my third DYK nomination. Full text can be found on ResearchGate.
Improved to Good Article status by Dora the Axe-plorer ( talk). Self-nominated at 01:28, 31 October 2022 (UTC).
| General: Article is new enough and long enough |
|---|
| Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
|---|
|
| Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
|---|
|
| QPQ: None required. |
Overall:
@
Dora the Axe-plorer: Good article.
Going to approve in good faith due to foreign language sources.
Onegreatjoke (
talk)
13:10, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
-
The source says "probably the first aftershock study", but the hook assert this as a known fact. I think we need to tweak the wording in the hook. --
RoySmith
(talk)
23:06, 2 November 2022 (UTC)
- ALT blurb 1 ... that the first probable scientific study of aftershocks following a destructive earthquake was undertaken after the 1920 Xalapa earthquake?
Categories:
- Old requests for peer review
- Wikipedia good articles
- Natural sciences good articles
- Wikipedia Did you know articles
- GA-Class WikiProject Earthquakes articles
- High-importance WikiProject Earthquakes articles
- WikiProject Earthquakes articles
- GA-Class Mexico articles
- Mid-importance Mexico articles
- WikiProject Mexico articles
- GA-Class Disaster management articles
- Mid-importance Disaster management articles