1912 Jamaica hurricane has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: November 5, 2016. ( Reviewed version).

This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Weather: Tropical / Atlantic Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Weather, which collaborates on weather and related subjects on Wikipedia. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details. Articles Requested Project Resources Become a Member Project Talk Assessment A-Class Alerts WeatherWikipedia:WikiProject WeatherTemplate:WikiProject WeatherWeather articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Tropical cyclones (assessed as Mid-importance). This article is supported by the Atlantic hurricane work group (assessed as Mid-importance).

This review is transcluded from Talk:1912 Jamaica hurricane/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: CycloneIsaac ( talk · contribs) 03:28, 28 September 2016 (UTC) reply

I'll review it over the weekend.— CycloneIsaac ( Talk) 03:28, 28 September 2016 (UTC) reply

• Isn't Cuba one of the areas impacted? It should be in the infobox.
• "However, several banana plantations reported losses as high at 60% individually. The United Fruit Company sustained heavy losses due to the damage to banana trees." Can this sentence be merged?
• "Conditions on the island worsened as the hurricane neared the coast, as railway lines were heavily damaged by the winds and rain." Probably shouldn't use "as" multiple times in a sentence.

That's all I've got for now in terms of prose.— CycloneIsaac ( Talk) 04:33, 24 October 2016 (UTC) reply

• Fixed all of those. Thanks for reviewing-- 12george1 ( talk) 01:05, 1 November 2016 (UTC) reply