GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer: Mgasparin ( talk · contribs) 08:16, 20 January 2019 (UTC)
2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
All claims and facts are backed up with references and no original research appears to be present.
3. Is it broad in its coverage?
This article gives the reader a very balanced mix of generality and detail such that it would be useful to anyone.
4. Is it neutral?
5. Is it stable? No edit wars, etc:
6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
Plenty of pictures, perhaps even too many. I would consider removing some images from the article, although this is not mandatory.
Overall, this article is very well written and is very informative about the history, layout, constuction, etc., of this NYC subway station. It provides numerous images and cites all sources of factual information. I pass this article on these grounds. Mgasparin ( talk) 08:16, 20 January 2019 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer: Mgasparin ( talk · contribs) 08:16, 20 January 2019 (UTC)
2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
All claims and facts are backed up with references and no original research appears to be present.
3. Is it broad in its coverage?
This article gives the reader a very balanced mix of generality and detail such that it would be useful to anyone.
4. Is it neutral?
5. Is it stable? No edit wars, etc:
6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
Plenty of pictures, perhaps even too many. I would consider removing some images from the article, although this is not mandatory.
Overall, this article is very well written and is very informative about the history, layout, constuction, etc., of this NYC subway station. It provides numerous images and cites all sources of factual information. I pass this article on these grounds. Mgasparin ( talk) 08:16, 20 January 2019 (UTC)