Article ( | visual edit | history) · Article talk ( | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Jaguar ( talk · contribs) 18:17, 28 November 2016 (UTC) reply

Hi, I will be reviewing this against the GA criteria as part of a GAN sweep. I'll leave some comments soon. JAG UAR  18:17, 28 November 2016 (UTC) reply

Disambiguations: No links found.

Linkrot: No linkrot found in this article.

Checking against the GA criteria

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose, no copyvios, spelling and grammar): b ( MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

   "Neil Snow, from end to fullback on offense" - Neil Snow is already linked above

   "Boss Weeks was instructed to call his signal for the next play while the team was getting up from the last play" - same here, Boss Weeks is already linked above (wow what a name)

   Got some overlinking in the second paragraph of the "Week 1: Albion" section

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a ( reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c ( OR):

   No original research found.

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a ( major aspects): b ( focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b ( appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

This article is well written, comprehensive and well sourced. I don't think some overlinking is enough to put this on hold, so I've chosen not to delay this and pass it outright as it meets the criteria. Well done! JAG UAR  15:45, 29 November 2016 (UTC) reply