This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
1894–95 Small Heath F.C. season has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||
| ||||||||||
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the "
Did you know?" column on
May 28, 2011. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that a
phantom goal awarded against
Small Heath F.C. in the
1894–95 season led
the Football League to instruct
referees to inspect the goalnets before each match? |
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Miyagawa (talk) 20:06, 11 August 2011 (UTC)
I will conduct a review of this article. I'll have a read through now and add any points below as required. Miyagawa (talk) 20:06, 11 August 2011 (UTC)
Other than those few points, it's a really good article and a completely enjoyable read. Miyagawa (talk) 20:26, 11 August 2011 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
An enjoyable article that wasn't far from the criteria at all. Happy to pass this one as a GA. Miyagawa (talk) 12:14, 16 August 2011 (UTC)
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
1894–95 Small Heath F.C. season has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||
| ||||||||||
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the "
Did you know?" column on
May 28, 2011. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that a
phantom goal awarded against
Small Heath F.C. in the
1894–95 season led
the Football League to instruct
referees to inspect the goalnets before each match? |
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Miyagawa (talk) 20:06, 11 August 2011 (UTC)
I will conduct a review of this article. I'll have a read through now and add any points below as required. Miyagawa (talk) 20:06, 11 August 2011 (UTC)
Other than those few points, it's a really good article and a completely enjoyable read. Miyagawa (talk) 20:26, 11 August 2011 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
An enjoyable article that wasn't far from the criteria at all. Happy to pass this one as a GA. Miyagawa (talk) 12:14, 16 August 2011 (UTC)