Article ( | visual edit | history) · Article talk ( | history) · Watch

Reviewer: -- Big Dom 19:18, 22 December 2009 (UTC) reply

Comments

Generally a well written article, just have a few minor points:

Lead

• "Oxford has also previously won the tournament" – seems to be in the wrong tense

Route to the final

• "replay" – could be wikilinked
• "Wanderers beat the other of the great universities, Cambridge University 1–0" – needs another comma after University

Summary

• In the last sentence of the first paragraph, the stadium should be named as it is the first mention of it in the section
• "giving the university team the lead" – in previous mentions, "university" has been capitalised
• "the cup holders held" – "holders" and then "held" is a bit repetitive

External links

• If the match report is "inaccurate", there doesn't seem to be much point linking to it

If you have any questions, don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Also, I have added this review to my watchlist. Thanks, -- Big Dom 20:10, 22 December 2009 (UTC) reply

All done -- ChrisTheDude ( talk) 21:30, 22 December 2009 (UTC) reply

Review

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b ( MoS):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c ( OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

Points addressed - pass with congratulations. -- Big Dom 21:55, 22 December 2009 (UTC) reply