Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer: Cyclonebiskit ( talk) 15:08, 21 February 2010 (UTC)
Overall this is a nicely research and well-written article on an old earthquake. There are just a few minor concerns I have (listed above) that need to be addressed before I can pass this article. As such, I'm putting the article on hold for seven days to allow time for these to be taken care of. Cyclonebiskit ( talk) 15:08, 21 February 2010 (UTC)
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer: Cyclonebiskit ( talk) 15:08, 21 February 2010 (UTC)
Overall this is a nicely research and well-written article on an old earthquake. There are just a few minor concerns I have (listed above) that need to be addressed before I can pass this article. As such, I'm putting the article on hold for seven days to allow time for these to be taken care of. Cyclonebiskit ( talk) 15:08, 21 February 2010 (UTC)