This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

United States: Presidents / Government Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject United States Presidents (assessed as Low-importance). This article is supported by WikiProject U.S. Government (assessed as Low-importance). U.S. Congress Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject U.S. Congress, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United States Congress on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.U.S. CongressWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. CongressTemplate:WikiProject U.S. CongressU.S. Congress articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is about one (or many) event(s).

There was no vandalism, because I have used the same website for each new article about union addresses. Cancina5645 ( talk) 00:04, 12 July 2014 (UTC) reply

Hi there, the message you are referring to said nothing at all about vandalism. It was just a bot pointing out the text you added to an article was similar to text found on another website and that there was the possibility it was copyrighted material. That's all, nobody accused you of vandalism. If you didn't copy from that website, than there should be no problems. Cmr08 ( talk) 00:21, 12 July 2014 (UTC) reply