![]() | Muharram Rebellion has been listed as one of the
Warfare good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: January 20, 2020. ( Reviewed version). |
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Muharram Rebellion article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: CPA-5 ( talk · contribs) 10:46, 26 September 2019 (UTC)
Claim my seat here. Cheers. CPA-5 ( talk) 10:46, 26 September 2019 (UTC)
Infobox
Sources
Images
There's a lot of work to do here, but if you can address them then it is a GA. Cheers. CPA-5 ( talk) 14:48, 26 September 2019 (UTC)
direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons. "Likely to be challenged" is very broad and generally if a reviewer asks for a cite the nominator is expected to provide it. AIRcorn (talk) 08:20, 2 December 2019 (UTC)
CPA-5, UserNumber, where does this review stand, and what is left to be done at this point? There hasn't been any activity on this page since December 2, and only minor edits to the article since then, possibly due to the conflicting recommendations at the beginning of December. Thanks. BlueMoonset ( talk) 18:50, 19 January 2020 (UTC)
![]() | Muharram Rebellion has been listed as one of the
Warfare good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: January 20, 2020. ( Reviewed version). |
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Muharram Rebellion article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: CPA-5 ( talk · contribs) 10:46, 26 September 2019 (UTC)
Claim my seat here. Cheers. CPA-5 ( talk) 10:46, 26 September 2019 (UTC)
Infobox
Sources
Images
There's a lot of work to do here, but if you can address them then it is a GA. Cheers. CPA-5 ( talk) 14:48, 26 September 2019 (UTC)
direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons. "Likely to be challenged" is very broad and generally if a reviewer asks for a cite the nominator is expected to provide it. AIRcorn (talk) 08:20, 2 December 2019 (UTC)
CPA-5, UserNumber, where does this review stand, and what is left to be done at this point? There hasn't been any activity on this page since December 2, and only minor edits to the article since then, possibly due to the conflicting recommendations at the beginning of December. Thanks. BlueMoonset ( talk) 18:50, 19 January 2020 (UTC)