![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
![]() | This article is based on material taken from the Free On-line Dictionary of Computing prior to 1 November 2008 and incorporated under the "relicensing" terms of the GFDL, version 1.3 or later. |
A UART is not a microprocessor! This has been in the article for years! -- Wtshymanski 15:16, 13 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Early 16550 chips had a bug, which allowed them to only really function as 16450 chips, this was fixed with the 16550A and later revisions.
...and yet I have no ambition to learn the Wiki syntax to link the silly thing into the article. It's up at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Exar16550onItronixPCB.jpg if somebody with a clue wants to handle that. Thanks. Myself248 08:14, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
It would be nice to have the dates they were first released listed somewhere. -- 68.48.43.61 ( talk) 2012-03-02 14:36:59 (UTC)
I'm wondering about the part that says: "At speeds higher than 9600 baud[...]". Is baud correct here, or should it read BPS? -- 80.222.99.8 ( talk) 12:11, 29 November 2015 (UTC)
Could a description of this UART be added by someone? I don't see it on the list. 66.169.230.39 ( talk) 21:13, 19 February 2022 (UTC)
The word speed doesn't seem correct. Baud rate perhaps, not speed. See baud vs. bps discussion. 66.169.230.39 ( talk) 21:16, 19 February 2022 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
![]() | This article is based on material taken from the Free On-line Dictionary of Computing prior to 1 November 2008 and incorporated under the "relicensing" terms of the GFDL, version 1.3 or later. |
A UART is not a microprocessor! This has been in the article for years! -- Wtshymanski 15:16, 13 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Early 16550 chips had a bug, which allowed them to only really function as 16450 chips, this was fixed with the 16550A and later revisions.
...and yet I have no ambition to learn the Wiki syntax to link the silly thing into the article. It's up at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Exar16550onItronixPCB.jpg if somebody with a clue wants to handle that. Thanks. Myself248 08:14, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
It would be nice to have the dates they were first released listed somewhere. -- 68.48.43.61 ( talk) 2012-03-02 14:36:59 (UTC)
I'm wondering about the part that says: "At speeds higher than 9600 baud[...]". Is baud correct here, or should it read BPS? -- 80.222.99.8 ( talk) 12:11, 29 November 2015 (UTC)
Could a description of this UART be added by someone? I don't see it on the list. 66.169.230.39 ( talk) 21:13, 19 February 2022 (UTC)
The word speed doesn't seem correct. Baud rate perhaps, not speed. See baud vs. bps discussion. 66.169.230.39 ( talk) 21:16, 19 February 2022 (UTC)