A fact from 1623 papal conclave appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the Did you know column on 17 July 2017 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
This article is within the scope of
WikiProject Roman Curia, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Roman CuriaWikipedia:WikiProject Roman CuriaTemplate:WikiProject Roman CuriaRoman Curia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject European Microstates, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
European Microstates on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.European MicrostatesWikipedia:WikiProject European MicrostatesTemplate:WikiProject European MicrostatesEuropean Microstates articles
1623 papal conclave is within the scope of WikiProject Catholicism, an attempt to better organize and improve the quality of information in articles related to the
Catholic Church. For more information, visit the
project page.CatholicismWikipedia:WikiProject CatholicismTemplate:WikiProject CatholicismCatholicism articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums articles
I will go ahead and review this article, since all the Papal conclave articles are short and easy to review and no one else seems to be taking them at the moment. --
Katolophyromai (
talk) 01:18, 25 November 2017 (UTC)reply
This time around I do not have any criticisms that need to be addressed before I pass the article. As far as I am concerned, the article seems to meet all of the GA criteria as it is.
GA review (see
here for what the criteria are, and
here for what they are not)
The article is well-written, at least from my perspective.
The article is well-cited, like the other papal conclave articles I have reviewed previously.
The article covers the subject adequately. It is short, like all the others, but the subject matter does not require a lengthy article to convey the information.
The article is neutral and does not unfairly favor one side over the others.
The article is very stable and the edit history reveals no signs of vandalism or edit-warring.
The portrait of Urban VIII fulfills the media requirement, I think. --
Katolophyromai (
talk) 02:09, 30 November 2017 (UTC)reply
A fact from 1623 papal conclave appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the Did you know column on 17 July 2017 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
This article is within the scope of
WikiProject Roman Curia, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Roman CuriaWikipedia:WikiProject Roman CuriaTemplate:WikiProject Roman CuriaRoman Curia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject European Microstates, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
European Microstates on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.European MicrostatesWikipedia:WikiProject European MicrostatesTemplate:WikiProject European MicrostatesEuropean Microstates articles
1623 papal conclave is within the scope of WikiProject Catholicism, an attempt to better organize and improve the quality of information in articles related to the
Catholic Church. For more information, visit the
project page.CatholicismWikipedia:WikiProject CatholicismTemplate:WikiProject CatholicismCatholicism articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums articles
I will go ahead and review this article, since all the Papal conclave articles are short and easy to review and no one else seems to be taking them at the moment. --
Katolophyromai (
talk) 01:18, 25 November 2017 (UTC)reply
This time around I do not have any criticisms that need to be addressed before I pass the article. As far as I am concerned, the article seems to meet all of the GA criteria as it is.
GA review (see
here for what the criteria are, and
here for what they are not)
The article is well-written, at least from my perspective.
The article is well-cited, like the other papal conclave articles I have reviewed previously.
The article covers the subject adequately. It is short, like all the others, but the subject matter does not require a lengthy article to convey the information.
The article is neutral and does not unfairly favor one side over the others.
The article is very stable and the edit history reveals no signs of vandalism or edit-warring.
The portrait of Urban VIII fulfills the media requirement, I think. --
Katolophyromai (
talk) 02:09, 30 November 2017 (UTC)reply