12th Central Committee of the Communist Party of Vietnam is a former featured article candidate. Please view the links under Article milestones below to see why the nomination failed. For older candidates, please check the archive. | ||||||||||
|
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 13:38, 25 May 2023 (UTC)
Some comments:
Nguyễn Phú Trọng delivered the opening speech, and said that over the past year, the Politburo and the Secretariat had directed the Government Party Committee, other party committees and relevant agencies to urgently and seriously prepare schemes, reports and submissions to the 7th Plenary Session. It doesn't add very much because it's obvious that party committees and agencies would be submitting reports for the plenary. Another example:
As CPV General Secretary, he instructed that 12th CC members should thoroughly consider the documents and proposals in the drafts.It's obvious that they should consider documents and proposals; that's their job as delegates. On the other hand, there isn't enough information on the substance of the meetings. For example, the "regulations on the enforcement of the Party's Charter and the regulations on party inspection, supervision and discipline" are discussed several times in the 4–7 July 2016 section, but there's no description of what those policies are. The discussion of wage reform is a good example of how you can incorporate substance better in other parts of the article.
voorts ( talk/ contributions) 22:16, 10 September 2023 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: FenrisAureus ( talk · contribs) 07:35, 22 December 2023 (UTC)
Hello fellow traveller! I will be reviewing this nomination over the course of the next 14 days. If you have time, please consider reviewing an article at WP:GAN.— FenrisAureus ▲ (she/they) ( talk) 20:11, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
Last updated: 02:29, 1 March 2024 (UTC) by Thebiguglyalien
See what the criteria are and what they are not
1) Well-written
2) Verifiable with no original research
Reference # | / | Comment |
---|---|---|
86 | — | |
153 | — | |
52 | — | |
119 | — | |
18 | — |
3) Broad in its coverage
4) Neutral:
5) Stable:
6) Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio
Overall:
Deepest apologies, fellow traveller. I have been trying but I just don't have the focus to review this article right now. Extenuating circumstances necessitate that I withdraw as reviewer. A bot will put the nomination back into the cue. — FenrisAureus ▲ (she/they) ( talk) 12:12, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
12th Central Committee of the Communist Party of Vietnam is a former featured article candidate. Please view the links under Article milestones below to see why the nomination failed. For older candidates, please check the archive. | ||||||||||
|
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 13:38, 25 May 2023 (UTC)
Some comments:
Nguyễn Phú Trọng delivered the opening speech, and said that over the past year, the Politburo and the Secretariat had directed the Government Party Committee, other party committees and relevant agencies to urgently and seriously prepare schemes, reports and submissions to the 7th Plenary Session. It doesn't add very much because it's obvious that party committees and agencies would be submitting reports for the plenary. Another example:
As CPV General Secretary, he instructed that 12th CC members should thoroughly consider the documents and proposals in the drafts.It's obvious that they should consider documents and proposals; that's their job as delegates. On the other hand, there isn't enough information on the substance of the meetings. For example, the "regulations on the enforcement of the Party's Charter and the regulations on party inspection, supervision and discipline" are discussed several times in the 4–7 July 2016 section, but there's no description of what those policies are. The discussion of wage reform is a good example of how you can incorporate substance better in other parts of the article.
voorts ( talk/ contributions) 22:16, 10 September 2023 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: FenrisAureus ( talk · contribs) 07:35, 22 December 2023 (UTC)
Hello fellow traveller! I will be reviewing this nomination over the course of the next 14 days. If you have time, please consider reviewing an article at WP:GAN.— FenrisAureus ▲ (she/they) ( talk) 20:11, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
Last updated: 02:29, 1 March 2024 (UTC) by Thebiguglyalien
See what the criteria are and what they are not
1) Well-written
2) Verifiable with no original research
Reference # | / | Comment |
---|---|---|
86 | — | |
153 | — | |
52 | — | |
119 | — | |
18 | — |
3) Broad in its coverage
4) Neutral:
5) Stable:
6) Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio
Overall:
Deepest apologies, fellow traveller. I have been trying but I just don't have the focus to review this article right now. Extenuating circumstances necessitate that I withdraw as reviewer. A bot will put the nomination back into the cue. — FenrisAureus ▲ (she/they) ( talk) 12:12, 3 January 2024 (UTC)