12-3 incident was nominated as a History good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (June 4, 2020). There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
12-3 incident received a peer review by Wikipedia editors, which is now archived. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article. |
This article is written in Hong Kong English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, realise, travelled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 21:07, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Marqoz ( talk · contribs) 02:48, 5 April 2020 (UTC)
I do strongly vote against Good Articel nomination for the article and this is why.
Having all these in mind the article while having important factual information, needs new sources to cover neutrality issues and some wording correction to express objectivity, to be considered for Good Article Nomination.
I'm going to boldly close this as a fail since Jp16103 has been regularly active since the last ping several weeks ago but hasn't responded. Kingsif ( talk) 04:46, 4 June 2020 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 06:51, 14 November 2020 (UTC)
12-3 incident was nominated as a History good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (June 4, 2020). There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
12-3 incident received a peer review by Wikipedia editors, which is now archived. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article. |
This article is written in Hong Kong English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, realise, travelled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 21:07, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Marqoz ( talk · contribs) 02:48, 5 April 2020 (UTC)
I do strongly vote against Good Articel nomination for the article and this is why.
Having all these in mind the article while having important factual information, needs new sources to cover neutrality issues and some wording correction to express objectivity, to be considered for Good Article Nomination.
I'm going to boldly close this as a fail since Jp16103 has been regularly active since the last ping several weeks ago but hasn't responded. Kingsif ( talk) 04:46, 4 June 2020 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 06:51, 14 November 2020 (UTC)