![]() | A fact from 1100–1200 in European fashion appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 13 August 2007. The text of the entry was as follows:
| ![]() |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
I think I've said before (talk on 1400-1500 maybe), I feel we really should go for a longer period, say Early medieval European dress, covering c. 400 to 1200, or maybe 1100. We can't go back in centuries for ever, & a longer, fuller article with maybe sections for centuries would be better. What do others think? Johnbod 16:56, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
I have kicked the boat out on Early medieval European dress, only to see Anglo-Saxon dress has just appeared on the template! I won't do any more till I return, so please help! Johnbod 01:25, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
Things to add to General Trends:
- PKM 20:02, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
![]() | A fact from 1100–1200 in European fashion appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 13 August 2007. The text of the entry was as follows:
| ![]() |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
I think I've said before (talk on 1400-1500 maybe), I feel we really should go for a longer period, say Early medieval European dress, covering c. 400 to 1200, or maybe 1100. We can't go back in centuries for ever, & a longer, fuller article with maybe sections for centuries would be better. What do others think? Johnbod 16:56, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
I have kicked the boat out on Early medieval European dress, only to see Anglo-Saxon dress has just appeared on the template! I won't do any more till I return, so please help! Johnbod 01:25, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
Things to add to General Trends:
- PKM 20:02, 11 August 2007 (UTC)