This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
101st Field Artillery Regiment article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Article reassessed and graded as start class. Referencing and appropriate inline citation guidelines not met. Coverage of the unit's history appears to be nothing but a list of events, this needs to be expanded. -- dashiellx ( talk) 11:25, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!
-- JeffGBot ( talk) 21:36, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!
-- JeffGBot ( talk) 21:37, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
As a minimum, these entries should have a source. Typically these entries are limited to individuals who have their own article in Wikipedia (or are likely to) - hence "notable". At present, this section does not follow this standard. Rklawton ( talk) 00:21, 13 April 2020 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
101st Field Artillery Regiment article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Article reassessed and graded as start class. Referencing and appropriate inline citation guidelines not met. Coverage of the unit's history appears to be nothing but a list of events, this needs to be expanded. -- dashiellx ( talk) 11:25, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!
-- JeffGBot ( talk) 21:36, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!
-- JeffGBot ( talk) 21:37, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
As a minimum, these entries should have a source. Typically these entries are limited to individuals who have their own article in Wikipedia (or are likely to) - hence "notable". At present, this section does not follow this standard. Rklawton ( talk) 00:21, 13 April 2020 (UTC)